Hi Wayne; Now, you've done it. You got me all excited and now I can't wait to try those two units. But still, 67 MPG is not bat at all considering that this is the more visceral of the two transmission trims and I suspect that there may be more we can get out of these babies given a bit of time behind the wheel. Also, glad to hear the electric assist is now greatly reduced at the lower speeds and low acceleration rates. This has always a major complaint of ours for years and it is nice to see Honda changing the rules a bit on the CR-Z. Also, did you notice any discrepancy yet between the indicated MPG's and the actual MPG at the pump? Just for giggles: When at steady state in gears above 3rd, if you let off the accelerator a bit and then gently reapply, to you see the typical electric only push? While I don't think it is worth much, I am kind of interested in seeing how much basic power-train management DNA they carried over from the HI-II especially since they stated the traditional hybrid contribution was going to be lower on the CR-Z. In case you haven't been told enough... keep those reports coming. Cheers; MSantos
Hi Gordon: Sightlines are a little tough coming from the HI-I, HI-II and Prius-II and –III split rear window hatches. This one has the smallest views. But the exterior looks so nice About that exterior. The roof profile is about the flattest I have seen in a car to date. Remind me to snap a close-up as it has an interesting profile close up. You could almost have dinner on the roof with the integrated rear spoiler into a Kammback taking care of the turbulence coming off the back of the rear window. Also, the ECO mode will stay locked in during startup after finding it in the settings menu. That said, you can really customize the CR-Z. From the lights and locks to the instrumentation. A lot for the owner to "play" with which the younger folks tend to do. I almost wish Honda would give these out to 50 or so 21 - 25 year olds because they would come away from the CR-Z with an entirely different perspective than the stodgy Auto Journalists have to date. This thing is really fun with the hand shaker. If I were a single guy, I would rather drive it than a Prius or HI-II because it is such a fun car to swing around. The FE may not be Prius and HI-II like but it is certainly Jetta TDI like so far and that was a fun handling car but lacked the futuristic interior instrumentation and controls that Honda has included with the CR-Z. MSantos, I love this lack of assist while driving it. You step into it and its all there. You simply drive it and once in a while you might see one or two bars if in to tall a gear for the terrain but rarely do you see it. There seems to be a hidden bar of forced charge that has been up for most of the time I have been driving. I have not seen SOC at anything but 6-bars the entire time I have driven it so you do not have to play the SoC management game like we have had to in the HI-I, HI-II, HCH-I and HCH-II. Just drive it and you never have to concern yourself that SoC was two bars low and you are heading to a Forced charging situation like every other IMA equipped hybrid in the past. It is almost like Honda has decided to listen to us and stopped the SoC management nightmare we have all been through at one time or another . Honda really did make this work good. Regarding FE from the aFCD to actual, I have not yet topped off the car for the FE details but will do it tomorrow and go for the drive for SG-II calibration and aFCD to actual error rates. Also, the brakes have far less Regen/fake braking feel than before. I am sure that is to the detriment of its FE but it feels much more normal than most hybrids as they transition. I have yet to do any soft glides or any of that yet as I have been driving it for such a short distance but we’ll get into that here very soon. Maybe tonight after the Steady State drives? Ride Handling Given it has the wheel base of a Mini, its ride is compliant but rougher than the std. mid-size land yacht. Accord, Camry, Fusion, Malibu, Sonata all apply in the land yacht like feel by comparison. With JP at my side, I took him through one of my handling test areas at the empty large concrete pad at Illinois’ most Northern Truck weigh station on US-41. Incident was about 30 mph and I turned the wheel hard. It did not understeer and it did not oversteer. Simply a nice balanced touch as all 4 wheels were squealing away in the decreasing radius impediment avoidance handling test as speed was bled off to 10 mph. A very good neutral handling feel from start to finish. The manufacturers are getting really good at this as of late and Honda did its usual excellent job with the CR-Z. I will try and get out later tonight and knock out the Steady State Speed tests on I-94 between the IL/WI border and Milwaukee, WI. It looks like rain right now so those tests may be delayed. Wayne
I agree with you that most auto journalists when it comes to the CR-Z are frankly, idiots. All of my friends here, like myself, are under 30 and everyone I know is absolutely OBSESSED with fuel economy. I have showed them all the CR-Z and they think its the most exciting thing they've seen since they first got online about 12 years ago when we were all kids. Older folks here just don't seem to 'get' the CR-Z and why its exciting. Its a beautiful, well build vehicle, full of high technology, brilliant style and extremely economical. More importantly for the younger market, its a fashion statement. The CR-Z is the iPod of automobiles. Just like the Citroen DS3, the new Mini and other such cars which are establishing a cult following, its all about being a fashion accessory and what it says about you. I predict that because of that the CR-Z will be quite popular here. I've noticed that someone a few blocks up from where I live has a black CR-Z and the intense jealousy that came over me with a car was unreal. I have never felt that with someone driving one of the new Jag's or an Aston Martin, but when I saw that I admired, and hated the guy at the same time, because he got his before I got mine! Like you said Wayne, its fun to throw around The same day I done the 124mph run in the CR-Z I decided to see just how well it could slide and flick into corners, and it is soooo brilliantly balanced and so much fun. Easiest car I've been able to do a Scandinavian Flick in it. I really shouldn't be saying that because I'm a driving instructor, but I'm also a total gearhead and can't help it haha! As soon as I get the car I'm taking it to the Crail or Knockhill tracks. The ride is nothing compared to say, a top of the line Citroen or Jaguar, but for a low sport coupe, its bloody amazing, even compared to the Fiesta. The seating is just a dream though. Good thing it doesn't have a massage facility or I'd fall asleep in it. If I can get one of those seats for my instruction car, I'd be a very happy man.
Hi All: Temps of 66 - 68 degrees F, a wisp of a cross wind and low traffic volume between 01:00 and 03:30 AM from the IL/WI border to Milwaukee and back again a number of times. Tire pressures at 55 psi and I allowed the rain soaked highways to dry before I began the multiple runs at multiple speeds… Set CC at the target, reset the aFCD as soon as I crossed a given even number elevation and after at least 5-miles while crossing the same elevation, I would record the aFCD. The Eco Mode based steady state - CC FE numbers are as follows: 45 mph - 58 mpg 50 mph - 53 mpg 55 mph - 49 mpg 60 mph - 46 mpg 65 mph - 43 mpg 70 mph - 38 mpg These are averages off the aFCD which I do not have an calibration vs. actual FE yet. In Sport Mode, the 60 mph speed target yielded 1 mpg lower than the Eco mode at 45 mpg. Eco Mode would allow as much as a 4-mph droop (DWL) when climbing yet used a lot more short assist bursts at 60, 65 and 70 mph then I would ever allow if the accelerator were under my control. Sport mode hung at 60 mph dead even with actually fewer assist blasts while maintaining the 60 mph speed. Those Gear Ratios... In sixth we had the following: 50 mph - 2,050 RPM's 60 mph - 2,450 RPM 70 mph - 2,900 RPM Sort of linear as it should be but we know where the Highway FE went. Speedometer vs. GPS. The Speedo was dead on at 50 mph but was 1 mph over at 70 mph compared to the GPS. Lights On like all IMA systems before it pushed SoC up a bit. During daylight hours (DRL's only) and lights off, 6-bars is IMA's normal seek. With lights on, IMA seeks 7-bars. Manuel, there is a type of glide mode but it is not like we are used to in the HCH-II or HI-II. To make it appear, I would build SoC up so no forced charging appears, let off to get a short 4 to 6 bars of regen and reapply the accelrator slowly to no bars showing. In this mode, it was a clean glide by all appearances but I will play with this more once I have an SG-II hooked up to watch it. No Samba but it appeared to be a clean fuel cut glide for the briefest of moments. As soon as you added a fraction of accelerator pedal, the injectors would come on and the engine would take over. No Electric assist glide w/ the ICE’ injectors shut down that I could tell. When the 60 + mph CC speed runs were in progress and some of the overpass climbs saw upwards of 8-bars of assist, SoC dropped to as little as 3-bars with a quick recovery from a 1-bar forced charge that I have been writing about since yesterday. To go along with that heavier than I would ever use Assist at the higher speeds under CC, the Pack fan is a bit loud when it runs due to no seat in the back to mask it. Road and interior noise at speed… Above 60 mph and you begin noticing the road and wind noise coming in strong. Ventilation. Does not seem as powerful as it could be? Even at max fan, a lot of noise but not as much air flow as I would have expected. I need some sleep as there are a few other items… Wayne
2050 rpm at 50 mph is exactly the same as my Civic. Sad to see that spec, given the extra gear they had to play with. Most days I drive mine like a short-top, tall-bottom, close ratio 4-speed using only 2,3,4,5. Only on uphill starts to I use first. For my normal driving cycles, though, the gear ratios are fine. I legally can't go over 55 anywhere on my commute, and that's only for one short segment. It's on the occasional highway trip that I start to hate the revs.
Hi Wayne, I agree with Andrew on the RPMS as well. As we had discussed, this was a serious possibility even though we had "sort of" hoped for the opposite. ... which may push the FE advantage on the highway once again to the CVT equipped model. So, the CVT model would win on several counts: - Potentially higher gearing for lower RPM, higher FE on the highway segments - Active suppression of engine output on the CVT trim that automatically implies higher FE (but lower 0-60 performance than the MT6). - A more authoritative PCM with broader control over the ICE and hybrid functions (still need more detail info on this one though). On the braking experience... also as discussed, that is exactly what the design team had stated. In addition to the benefits of a steadier and healthier SoC, the frequent sub-1 bar regen may be a real necessity when paired with a diminished regenerative braking profile. Awesome details. Please, keep 'em comin' MSantos
This is one of my major complaints driving the Insight II. Such a large drift seems to create a needless waste of energy to make up the difference. Around Cincinnati highways ECON seems to actually consume more fuel for Steady-State driving than normal mode. ECON's muted throttle response, however, makes finding the glide point and maintaining 2k RPM during P&G acceleration much easier. JP
Hi All: That was a long night waiting for the roads to dry... When hitting minor bumps and expansion strips, the CR-Z does not even make a noise. When driven over a pot hole for example, it take s a good hit but the suspension does not loose its composure. I have a left hand turn over an ~ 1" pavement to curb sharp edge and then the sd. 2 to 3" rolling curb after that and the CR-Z handles it well but there is a lot of rear suspension noise intrusion. I suspect all cars are equally noisy but with just plastic in the back seat, you "hear" a lot more. Honda's Hybrid Instrumentation like all IMA equipped vehicles is top notch and is only getting better. The green is good mantra (glow around the Speedometer) is a very good feedback device during acceleration. More so than the iFCD and the upshift/downshift indicator. During accel, it will turn blue just as the upshift indicator indicated upshift. However, once at 30 mph and you are in sixth, it stay green.. For probably ever? I suspect it stays green on the highway whenever you are above its EPA combined of 34 mph and as you can tell by steady state FE data above, you would have to be driving 75 + mph before you would reach that low of a number. I never drive 75 mph or more so she'll always be green more than likely When a Press Fleet car arrives, the handlers usually fill it up to first click somewhere along the way from its past location so you are not full like we like. I have only placed about 175 miles on it during this initial testing phase and the tank is already down about 7/16. I will fill it later today and take it out for a good lengthy run tomorrow. Due to it having a stick, blowing by EPA is easy of course but the steady state numbers are only so so for what we are used to. Expected given the EPA and all but you have to go advanced for the larger numbers vs. CC and let it do all the driving... I was impressed that ECO allowed the std. speed droop during a climb which means Honda’s latest IMA based Eco Mode is ahead of everybody else. Good Luck Wayne
Some of my thoughts... One of the things I just have to glow about (and absolutely envy) is the instrument cluster. It's laid out well with the return of SOC and FE on separate screens instead of the single MID on the Insight 2. The controls of the FCD/system computer should be familiar to anyone who has spent time with an Insight 2 or the newer Fit. I felt the quality of plastics was of a "higher" quality than in the Insight 2 and also took note of the added chrome-plastic. While I could do without the chrome-stuff the "better" plastic felt like it would be less-prone to scratching (something I've done a bit of to the interior of my Insight 2). As Wayne said before the seatbelts take some reaching to get to even if the seat is push to the farthest back it can go. That felt kind of weird but, now that I think about it, that made the ingress/egress from the car a no-strainer. I thought the trunk (rear "seat" down) was roomier than the trunk in my friend's Insight 1 but, obviously, couldn't verify that. It was certainly big and it looked capable of holding one of my guitars (if not two). I wish I had brought it to try the fit. The play of the accelerator and the brake are a dream-come-true. This is absolutely the least spongy pedal feedback system ever. Even the throttle response difference between ECON and NORM didn't seem as drastic as on the Insight II. And not being a manual-transmission guy, FAS with a bump-start is the coolest thing ever. I should point out that Wayne actually (graciously) taught me to drive stick on this outing. My wife was happy to hear that since she's been goading me to learn. Wayne, one thing I forgot to ask you about while I was driving the CR-Z (and trying to not stall, lol!) was what you felt about the height of the pedals. The clutch felt "higher" than the other pedals but, not being a normal stick-shift driver, I didn't know if that was normal. JP
Hi JP: Thanks for your input as always! Regarding the clutch pedal reach, it feels normal for me but I am attuned to sticks. I have to top it off tonight before the long drive in the morning and will try and make a mental note of the pedal placement. Good Luck Wayne
Hi All: The 2011 Honda CR-Z peering out of the darkness for her initial fill… Topped off 2,068 miles on the ticker and everything reset. 63.5 mpg w/ 1.8 miles as it sits in the drive right now. Something neat about this is the CR-Z is the first car/truck that I have filled with an almost vertical fuel fill port. Less chance of spillage and it just seems like the right thing to do vs. most with steep angled fill nozzles. And this is a really cool addition… Looking from the Drivers seat towards the rear window. The rear interior light(s) are wide angled beams that face forward and light the interior much better than flush mounted ceiling mounted units. In addition, the EX comes with Xenon HID’s which not only have a superior cutoff but are so bright to the sides I wish all cars had them! I did look up the turning radius which is 35.4’. Not as tight as I had expected but still one of the very best on the road. Somehow Honda has made the torsion beam rear end hold very well. More than likely it’s the tires but the package is really a fun to drive solution for the twenty something’s that would more than likely love to own this Fun to Drive Sports Coupe. The Rear privacy slider is sitting behind the rear seats so it does not fly around. It took a minute but again, somebody was thinking outside the box. It is not a puzzle piece to figure how to get out of the channel, its two ends squeeze in about ½ of an inch and you pull it out. Good Luck Wayne
Hi All: And my Drive Route for later today... Home to my own past - The Gerdes' from Germany settled in Woden, IA over 125 years ago... Good Luck Wayne
The rear interior light(s) are wide angled beams that face forward and light the interior much better than flush mounted ceiling mounted units. I noticed that when we were talking about the fake rear seats. That's a nice use of the rear seatbelt tensioner location instead of just sticking a plastic blank. JP
And some pictures: This is the (awesome) dash of the CR-Z. As you can see, everything is laid-out logically and follows a similar ethic to the Insight II dash. We also have the return of mostly digital readouts. The very nice thing is the SoC (state of charge) indicator that isn't nested in the MID menus. As you can see in the bottom right, it is capable as a high-FE machine -that's a combination of my awkward steady-state driving (north) and Wayne's actual advanced hypermiling (south). Now that I think about it, that number includes Wayne's stability test, too. Can't wait to see what the CR-Z is capable of when Wayne actually hypermiles her... JP
From the way the car looks and it seems to have the handling characteristics that can be built on, I see a combined market. The younger sect can carry forth the efficiency (or at least some) and make a great looking street machine.
Hi All: Looking for McDonald's w/ WiFi and found one abour half way between Dubuque and Waterloo, IA. Crossed the Mississippi at 62.0 as Hwy 20 went from four lanes to two and I had to pick it up to +5/-5 around the PSL of 55 mph. The the hills before Galena to Dubuque took her down from 63.9 mpg as a high so far. I pulled into this McDonald's and a group of Teenagers behind the counter started asking questions with mouths wide open... Should I race out of the parking lot to grab their attention? Nah, that woold take off 3/10ths. As stated previously, The CR-Z does not belong in the hands of someone like me or any other Auto Journalist. It belongs in the hands of a group of kids that just graduated from college and are looking to write a story on a really cool car If the CR-Z were a rag top, the Miata would die a slow and lonely death too! With the hills, I am FAS'ing wherever it makes sense of course so that is nothing new. The really neat thing is the NAVI, 12V to the phone, Bluetooth and stereo stay live as they are supposed to after the bump. I can just imagine the engineers designing the CR-Z having a discussion. The Performance guys are saying we are going to gear it insanely low to grab the kids imagination. The FE Engineers are overridden but they incorporate a Keep Alive solution for the electronics just for CleanMPG members who push the envelope Stereo is not a super HQ unit even with all 360W but it can blast some noise. A kid thingie again Assist will come on when its needed and the forced charge will bring it right back. I have seen a low of 4 bars during 500 + ft climbs and 8-bars on the return. She is getting used to 7 bars even while cruising down the highway... Interesting that I am using two bars of assit in fifth and it is srill flashing an upshift indicator at me at 40 + mph??? Still have not really let it loose yet so maybe tomorrow. Mike, Although breaking IMA will be tough, I can see the 20 something tuners wanting to get their hands on the CR-Z too. Dan, While the Fiesta has a cheap price and Sync, it is still a cheap rendition of a more expensive car. The CR-Z's dash is a wrap around unit that is an upgrade from the iCDTi we drove a few years back. Every bit as good as an Accord, Fusion Hybrid or anything else one may be interested in... Really well done. At the same time, it is missing a few pieces. No arm rest for one. Talk with you all soon. Wayne
Hi All: A few pics with more details later. She has an SHM mode but only for suburban travel under ~ 38 mph with LOD < 33%. 2011 near Iowa Fields of Corn at dusk 2011 Honda CR-Z in Woden, IA. 2011 Honda CR-Z with Wind Turbines in Iowa. 2011 Honda CR-Z Review at the pump in Britt, IA. 2011 Honda CR-Z - 65.0 mpg after 431 miles per the aFCD. 2011 Honda CR-Z – She’s topped off. 2011 Honda CR-Z - 6.543 gallons over 431.0 miles = 65.872 mpg. aFCD reads almost 1.5% under actual 2011 Honda CR-Z at the movies in Clear Lake, IA. Good Luck Wayne
Not bad! Nothing compared to the first gen Insight but quite respectable for a sporty coupe. :thumbs_up: