User Name Password    
CleanMPG, Learn to raise fuel economy and lower emissions in whatever you drive.  
MENU
• What is hypermiling? •
CleanMPG to AAA:
• Hypermiling Rebuttal •
 
• Home
• CleanMPG Staff
• Articles
• Fuel Economy Forums
      • Register
Go Hypermiling!

   Car Reviews:

2013 Elantra GT

2013 Elantra Coupe

2013 Lexus ES 300h

2013 Mazda CX-5


2013 Lexus GS 450h

2012 Prius c

2013 Malibu Eco

2012 Hyundai Accent
   Bike and Gear Reviews:

HTC Thunderbolt

2010 R 1200 GS (A)

Kawasaki KLX250SF

Zero S


Aerostich Darien

Shoei Hornet DS

Honda CRF230L

Yamaha XT250


• More Reviews
• Gallery
• Mileage Logs
 
• CleanMPG Store
 
• Calendar
• Glossary
• Garage
• Files
 
• Research
• Related Sites
 
• Archives
• Arcade
 
• Monthly Fuel Efficient •
Vehicle Sales Figures


ScanGauge with X-Gauge: $159.95

Pre-programming, a CleanMPG laser cut decal, and shipping included!



Even better value for members only is available in the latest SG-II w/ X-Gauge Group Buy purchase thread.



While we strive to provide only the highest quality information through our members' offerings, if you find the information provided valuable, please consider a donation so that we can offer an even better experience for the membership and guests well into the future.

Thank you

-Wayne Gerdes
Owner/Admin
CleanMPG



Home Fuel Economy Forums Gallery Mileage Logs

Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   CleanMPG Forums » Conventional Automobile Owners Community » Honda


Honda The Power of Dreams - Discussion about Honda and Honda automobiles.

Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.

Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 01:25 PM
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
PaleMelanesian PaleMelanesian is offline
Beat The System
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 2009 Fit, 2004 Odyssey, 96 Civic retired
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 12,782
Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

The Fit has been widely criticized as being geared too low. The result being it runs at high rpm at highway speed. Sometimes called a "buzz-bomb".

2007 Honda Fit
5th gear - 0.757
Final drive - 4.294

Then I looked up my 1996 Civic.
5th gear - 0.700
Final drive - 4.25

So this means I'm driving a buzz-bomb as well! The Fit's 1.5 engine has almost identical output to my 1.6 non-vtec, both in peak numbers / rpm and when comparing the dyno charts. They're also rated for the same mileage: 33 / 38.

It's not usually an issue for my normal driving - my routes are 55mph max. But on the interstate, where 70mph = 3200 rpm, HS-P&G becomes the only option for good mileage.
__________________
Andrew


----
100 mpg commute / 90.2 mpg tank = 1191 miles

Last edited by PaleMelanesian : 03-24-2008 at 02:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 01:36 PM
shifty35's Avatar
shifty35 shifty35 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicles: 2000 Honda Insight 5MT, 2004 Toyota Prius
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 801
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

3k RPM is the Civic's favorite rpm for steady state FE.

The Fit has a shorter 5th gear and a shorter final makes the overall shorter than yours.

Fit: 55 mph = 2784 RPM, 70 mph = 3408 RPM
Civic DX: 55 mph = 2578 RPM, 70 mph = 3243 RPM

You're going roughly 5 mph faster at the same RPM.

I wouldn't call the DX transmission a buzz bomb at all. Try the CX/VX transmission, which is roughly the same as the Insight's...

Granted, I tossed the DX trans in my old Civic for an EX one... now *that* is a buzz bomb.

Don't even get me started on the DOHC B16 / 99-00 Civic SI 5th and final! Something like 4.5-4.7k rpm at 60 mph...
__________________
Ben

Best commute: 108.1mpg in / 99.7 mpg out

Best tank: 1034 mi / 86.7 mpg per FCD

Reply With Quote
  #3   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 01:41 PM
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
PaleMelanesian PaleMelanesian is offline
Beat The System
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 2009 Fit, 2004 Odyssey, 96 Civic retired
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 12,782
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

Ha! You're right. For the 96-00 series, I've probably got one of the best transmissions.

But why do they do this? If you want to run 4.5k rpm on the highway, you can always use 4th gear, right?!!!
__________________
Andrew


----
100 mpg commute / 90.2 mpg tank = 1191 miles
Reply With Quote
  #4   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 01:42 PM
xcel's Avatar
xcel xcel is offline
PZEV, there's nothing like it :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicles: Accord, Ranger, and anything else ;)
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 42,657
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

Hi Andrew:

___Your DX might even be worse The calc’s to find RPM at 60 include the diameter of the tires. The Fit w/ a stick uses 175/65/R15’s with a diameter of 23.0” (Circumference of 6.0214 ft.) and an RPM at 60 mph of 2,850

___The formula for R’s at a given mph as follows: [(mph) * (fifth gear ratio) * (final drive ratio) * (88)]/(tire circumference)

___Others of note …

07 Corolla w/ a stick: 2,305
07 Yaris w/ a stick: 2,660
08 Smart ForTwo: 2,857

___Good Luck

___Wayne
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 01:46 PM
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
PaleMelanesian PaleMelanesian is offline
Beat The System
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 2009 Fit, 2004 Odyssey, 96 Civic retired
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 12,782
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

Oooooh! Didn't think of that. I have 175/70/13's.

That 3200 at 70 is my observed actual rpm. Calc'd by your formula is 3093. About the difference I've observed between speedo / odo and reality.
__________________
Andrew


----
100 mpg commute / 90.2 mpg tank = 1191 miles
Reply With Quote
  #6   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 01:56 PM
xcel's Avatar
xcel xcel is offline
PZEV, there's nothing like it :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicles: Accord, Ranger, and anything else ;)
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 42,657
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

Hi Andrew:

___You drive less of a buzz bomb than the current generation Fit …

My spread sheet pulled a 2,654 RPM at 60 mph for your DX w/ a stick:

Tire diameter of 22.6” (circumference of 5.91’) - 60 mph - fifth gear ratio of .700 - final drive of 4.25 yields 2,654 RPM.

___Good Luck

___Wayne
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 02:01 PM
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
PaleMelanesian PaleMelanesian is offline
Beat The System
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 2009 Fit, 2004 Odyssey, 96 Civic retired
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 12,782
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

That sounds about right. The point here is that Honda's ridiculous gear ratios is not a new problem.

It's not a terrible problem for me, given that I don't drive that fast. It also means that if I was to acquire a Fit, it would work for me in a similar way to what my civic does.
__________________
Andrew


----
100 mpg commute / 90.2 mpg tank = 1191 miles
Reply With Quote
  #8   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 05:44 PM
-mr. bill -mr. bill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2006 Honda Civic Si
Location: MA
Posts: 677
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

The point is "Honda's ridiculous gear ratios" has nothing to do with 0-60 times or quarter miles. Unless somebody thinks that a 1996 Civic DX was "tuned" by HoA for street racing.

-mr. bill
Reply With Quote
  #9   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 06:05 PM
xcel's Avatar
xcel xcel is offline
PZEV, there's nothing like it :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicles: Accord, Ranger, and anything else ;)
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 42,657
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

Hi Mr. Bill:

___I sure wish I knew what it had to do with? Pulling a 1,000 # trailer at 60 mph possibly? Honda’s choice to run their smallest cars with relatively higher powered engines did not make any sense 3 years ago and it most certainly doesn’t make any sense today?

___Good Luck

___Wayne
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-24-2008, 06:29 PM
ksstathead's Avatar
ksstathead ksstathead is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2008 Honda Fit Sport A5; 2000 Honda CRV A4; 2010 Prius III/Nav
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,813
Re: Gear ratios - 2007 Fit vs 1996 Civic

Just bought a 2008 Honda Fit with the 5AT for my wife. First trip out, 2 hours at 70mph cruise control was 35.2 mpg (new EPA 27/33). Return trip no cruise control with 9 mph head wind was 35.5 mpg (speed high 60's average with a little DWL). I was fairly pleased with that. Edit: 452 ft elevation change, downhill with cruise, uphill on return trip.

But the 5AT's RPM at 70 mph ran 2585 to 2615 almost all the time, and quiet as a mouse. This is substantially lower RPM than my Tacoma or CRV, I think.

So, is the MT geared lower than the AT?

I like the 5 speed auto. It can be flat towed and it goes into fuel cut on most every decel in gear. Has paddle shifters which I hope can help reduce RPM in town by bumping up early. Also, I can induce fuel cut and save brake wear by decel with the tranny when I cannot coast or am coming in hot to a stop.
__________________



Start your journey to better fuel economy here:
http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19408

Last edited by ksstathead : 03-24-2008 at 06:59 PM. Reason: elevation added
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Congratulations CleanMPG Hypermilers! xcel Fuel Economy 116 02-18-2012 09:01 PM
CleanMPG Reviews the 2007 Honda Civic 2.2L iCDTi Turbo Diesel xcel Reviews 31 07-21-2011 12:57 PM
2007 Honda Fit Long-Term Update No.5/ With-Pics: tigerhonaker Honda 23 10-05-2008 04:34 PM
Honda Fit is small yet practical tigerhonaker Honda 0 08-11-2006 06:01 PM
Honda FIT and Ready To Go -*** VIDEO ENHANCED STORY ***Great Article tigerhonaker Honda 1 04-04-2006 03:29 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2013, Clean MPG LLC. All Rights Reserved.