|
|
| ScanGauge Anything ScanGauge related is open for discussion here. |
Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.
Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|
Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
 |
|

01-09-2008, 11:43 AM
|
 |
Penguin of Notagascar
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicles: '12 LEAF SL, '02 Insight 5spd MT
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Posts: 20,598
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Thanks -- I'm aware of its uses but my car does not have this feature. I mentioned the after pulse behavior because what I saw was an odd fluctuation in instantaneous consistent with the ScanGauge thinking I was in fuel cut. I adjusted the feature to never activate and it went away.
What I saw was a kick to 9999mpg right after finishing the pulse and dropping to neutral. This was at peak RPM. The instantaneous would then drop to something reasonable as the tachometer needle descended... until it got close to idle. At that point it would again kick to 9999mpg briefly before returning to what it should show at idle for the speed. With the feature turned off, I see the numbers blip up a bit at those points, but not all the way to 9999mpg.
Coasting down in gear nets me only a few more mpg over steady state cruising because I lack fuel cut.
__________________
- Sean
|  | <-- She got to drive an EV before I did!!  |
I'm a slow driver with a FASed car!
New? Start here!
|

01-09-2008, 11:45 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2006 Honda Civic Si
Location: MA
Posts: 677
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Disagree that fuel cut only works while in gear!
After a pulse to say 3000 RPM, totally remove foot from accelerator pedal, push in the clutch or put it in neutral you *WILL* get a brief fuel cutoff until RPM drops to ~1000 RPM. Your engine is using the momentum of the flywheel to keep turning.
In a manual transmission car, you save a wee bit of fuel with each upshift because of this!
-mr. bill
|

01-09-2008, 12:54 PM
|
|
Biotech Researcher
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicles: 2006 Honda Civic Coupe EX
Location: Washington. DC
Posts: 250
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
True that the flywheel will keep the engine turning over for a short period of time that could give you the criteria needed for the fuel cutoff. However, the gains from such a short period are fairly minimal, but not to be over looked. The most fuel efficient method of using the fuel cut-off is to coast down in the highest gear possible for your speed.
|

01-14-2008, 02:53 AM
|
 |
Kaizen Driver
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Vehicles: 2002 Toyota Corolla Verso 1.6 VVT-i Manual
Location: Norway
Posts: 377
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mr. bill
Disagree that fuel cut only works while in gear!
After a pulse to say 3000 RPM, totally remove foot from accelerator pedal, push in the clutch or put it in neutral you *WILL* get a brief fuel cutoff until RPM drops to ~1000 RPM. Your engine is using the momentum of the flywheel to keep turning.
In a manual transmission car, you save a wee bit of fuel with each upshift because of this!
-mr. bill
|
Interesting. I do see this behaviour on the SG, but not on the iFCD of the car. I think the iFCD has a filter to avoid showing this behaviour (probably so as to not worry the not-so-technical drivers and have them running to the dealer with questions)
|

01-18-2008, 11:15 AM
|
|
Electromagnetic Wave [:-h
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicles: 2002 Toyota Celica GT-S/6 1996 Toyota Avalon XLS
Location: "Americas Hometown", MA
Posts: 124
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Does the Fuel Cutoff in the SGII effect its MPG calcs? I know that even in cutoff, my ICE uses a minimal amount of fuel.
|

01-18-2008, 12:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2006 Honda Civic Si
Location: MA
Posts: 677
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Well, I'm upgrading my SGII to the new firmware next week, but trust me, without fuel cutoff detection, you can get fairly high wrong GPH values at >7,000 RPM no throttle.
-mr. bill
|

01-22-2008, 08:48 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2012 VW Jetta TDI Manual
Location: California
Posts: 391
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
OK, I'm still trying to wrap my mind around this fuel cutoff idea. Since I've started hypermiling I've just been trying to be in neutral as often as possible because I thought that was the best way to save fuel. I was willing to sacrifice the additional wear on my brakes. This complicates things. So....
In a MT car with fuel cutoff, if you're gliding in gear and cutoff is activated, you aren't using fuel and the engine is still spinning and still powering the power steering/brakes etc. right? So then if you push in the clutch at this point without touching the gas, disconnecting the engine from the transmission and wheels, you're saying the engine automatically restarts so it can idle and provide power while you're in neutral? I would think you would notice that happening.
Looks like I might have to hook the SG back up and do some experimenting. Is fuel cutoff more prevalent in certain makes, models, or since a certain year?
__________________
Dave
Last edited by pumaman : 01-22-2008 at 08:59 PM.
|

01-23-2008, 10:35 AM
|
|
cheapskate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 1999 Chevrolet Prizm
Location: Boston MetroWest
Posts: 616
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumaman
you're saying the engine automatically restarts so it can idle and provide power while you're in neutral? I would think you would notice that happening.
...Is fuel cutoff more prevalent in certain makes, models, or since a certain year?
|
You can definitely tell when fuel cutoff ends in my car when it's at fast idle. If you're coasting down in gear to an intersection in gear at fast idle (when the PCM only allows 2d gear max anyway), the car will slow down until it's below the fast idle speed. At that point, it jerks slightly and maintains the idle RPM closed-loop, which also maintains a certain minimum speed.
AFAIK Fuel cutoff doesn't exist in carbureted cars, so it wouldn't have existed at all before the mid-1980s, when fuel injection started becoming more common. My car's engine was in production in 1998, although the previous generation may have had it as well.
__________________
|

01-23-2008, 01:30 PM
|
 |
Kaizen Driver
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Vehicles: 2002 Toyota Corolla Verso 1.6 VVT-i Manual
Location: Norway
Posts: 377
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumaman
Looks like I might have to hook the SG back up and do some experimenting. Is fuel cutoff more prevalent in certain makes, models, or since a certain year?
|
Toyota has been using it for many years now. I'll guess since 1986-1990 (?)
|

01-24-2008, 10:58 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2012 VW Jetta TDI Manual
Location: California
Posts: 391
|
|
|
Re: Scangauge II fuel cut off seems to work very well
Thanks. My car does act like it has it.
__________________
Dave
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|