|
|
| Start Your Journey Here Introductions and post the details of your vehicle and commute here. The experts will help get you up to speed by simplifying a lot of the techniques and helping you apply them to your specific situation. |
Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.
Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|
Hello - 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0L, question
 |

11-09-2007, 04:47 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicles: 1999 Ford Ranger (3.0L FFV)
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Hello - 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0L, question
Hello.
I have about a 26 mile commute in my 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0L (it's flex capable, never used anything but dead dinosaurs in it though). I inherited this truck from my Dad's estate a few years ago, and thus have quite a sentimental attachment to it.
Anyway, I live in Phoenix Arizona and am fortunate enough that 95 percent of my commute is freeway AND my employer allows flexible hours so that I can avoid the morning and evening parking lots that form due to rush hour traffic. Being that my commute is all over flat ground usually at constant speed I'm allowed for some of the best driving conditions for saving fuel.
By my rough estimations based on the trip meter between fill-ups, I'm seeing somewhere between 25-27 mpg. Most of this I attribute to just slowing down. I keep her at about 55-57 on the freeway and stay well to the right out of peoples' way. What is with everybody being SO anxious to get to their jobs anyway? Also, I always try to coast as far as I can to a light that's red and take it easy on the throttle when starting. And I only run the air conditioner when it's actually uncomfortable in the cab, while keeping the windows up at speed to avoid the effects of drag. Just your most basic fuel saving techniques really.
I've looked and the vehicle is rated at 22 mpg under the old 'flawed' EPA scheme. I'm kind of amazed that I'm able to beat that number by close to 25%, and I've debated getting a scanner or gauge to test how accurate it is. But I'd rather just keep that money and be pleased with my results.
My question is whether or not anyone thinks one of those webbed tailgates would help a truck's mileage that much. I searched the forums but couldn't find a lot of information.
What I've seen indicates that the tailgate serves an important aerodynamic function for a pickup, trapping a pocket of rotating air in the bed which serves to reduce the base drag of the flat backed cab, and keeping air flowing over the cab from slamming down into the bed, adding to the surface drag (at least, that's my understanding, I could be wrong). Thus it seems the only benefit of a webbed tailgate would be reducing the weight of the vehicle and MAYBE reducing some of the drag from air slamming into it by letting it pass through, while still maintaining normal circulation in the truck bed. I know the Mythbusters found a small increase with the net, but I'd like to hear from people who have done more extensive testing with them, if possible.
|

11-09-2007, 05:04 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicles: '08 FEH AWD
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 25
|
|
|
Re: Hello - 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0L, question
Myth busters did an episode where they test out a pickup trucks mileage with the tailgate in various positions and replaced with a net. I believe they found the tailgate was indeed as you say an important aerodynamic component.
|

11-09-2007, 06:45 PM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicles: 2007 Honda Fit Sport Auto 2010 Honda SH150I scooter
Location: Ormond Beach FL
Posts: 1,067
|
|
|
Re: Hello - 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0L, question
Your doing well. My son had the same truck and got 17 MPG.
__________________
|

11-09-2007, 07:21 PM
|
 |
Hypermiling Ironman
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 96 Ranger 5MT, 98 Ranger AT, 92 Ford Van AT
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,760
|
|
|
Re: Hello - 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0L, question
For a 6' bed pickup, the best results are:
half-tonneau cover (rear 1/2 of the bed)
full tonneau cover
tail gate up
tail gate down
tail gate net
This is per wind tunnel tests shown at the following link:
http://ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/ge...hi1/pickup.pdf
|

11-09-2007, 07:38 PM
|
|
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 03 Ranger(mostly), 07 Aveo(sometimes), 96 Taurus(occasionally), 01 saturn SL1 (rarely)
Location: NW IL
Posts: 2,774
|
|
|
Re: Hello - 1999 Ford Ranger 3.0L, question
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowHands
|
Good advice.
You are already doing a lot right. You're lucky to be able to avoid rush hour.
What sort of transmission do you have? If you have a MT and add pulse and glide to your techniques and press up your tires you may be able to beat Slow Hands % of EPA after a little practice and feedback from a gauge. (His truck TorqueNada has been torturing me  .)
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|