User Name Password    
CleanMPG, Learn to raise fuel economy and lower emissions in whatever you drive.  
MENU
• What is hypermiling? •
CleanMPG to AAA:
• Hypermiling Rebuttal •
 
• Home
• CleanMPG Staff
• Articles
• Fuel Economy Forums
      • Register
Go Hypermiling!

   Car Reviews:

2013 Elantra GT

2013 Elantra Coupe

2013 Lexus ES 300h

2013 Mazda CX-5


2013 Lexus GS 450h

2012 Prius c

2013 Malibu Eco

2012 Hyundai Accent
   Bike and Gear Reviews:

HTC Thunderbolt

2010 R 1200 GS (A)

Kawasaki KLX250SF

Zero S


Aerostich Darien

Shoei Hornet DS

Honda CRF230L

Yamaha XT250


• More Reviews
• Gallery
• Mileage Logs
 
• CleanMPG Store
 
• Calendar
• Glossary
• Garage
• Files
 
• Research
• Related Sites
 
• Archives
• Arcade
 
• Monthly Fuel Efficient •
Vehicle Sales Figures


ScanGauge with X-Gauge: $159.95

Pre-programming, a CleanMPG laser cut decal, and shipping included!



Even better value for members only is available in the latest SG-II w/ X-Gauge Group Buy purchase thread.



While we strive to provide only the highest quality information through our members' offerings, if you find the information provided valuable, please consider a donation so that we can offer an even better experience for the membership and guests well into the future.

Thank you

-Wayne Gerdes
Owner/Admin
CleanMPG



Home Fuel Economy Forums Gallery Mileage Logs

Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   CleanMPG Forums » Information » In the News


In the News News items that may be of interest. These show up on the front page.
Only Moderators may start threads, but anyone can respond to them.

Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.

Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

House Approves Clean Energy Bill.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 10:16 AM
tarabell tarabell is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Vehicles: 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,256
House Approves Clean Energy Bill.

The measure marks a dramatic turn for U.S. energy policy

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/GHG_-_Earth_Photo.jpg
Noam N. Levey & Richard Simon – Chicago Tribune – August 5, 2007

WASHINGTON — Pushing to chart a new national energy policy, House Democrats on Saturday passed legislation that would require the nation's utilities to generate more electricity from clean-energy sources, such as the wind and the sun.

And in another indicator of the changed political landscape on Capitol Hill, they stripped the oil and gas industries of $16 billion in tax incentives and voted to apply those tax breaks to efforts to spur production of cleaner forms of energy.

The energy measures passed in a final burst of activity before lawmakers were to adjourn for their summer recess this weekend.

Late Saturday, the House also modified the Foreign Intelligence Services Act. The changes, a concession to the White House that was strongly opposed by liberal Democrats, would expand the authority of U.S. spy agencies to monitor overseas phone calls and e-mails. The measure passed 227 to 183 — with Republicans providing 186 of the "yes" votes.

The House also approved as much as $255 million in emergency aid for repairs of the Interstate 35W bridge that collapsed Wednesday in Minneapolis.

The energy legislation, part of a broad energy package that congressional Democrats hope to send to the president later this year, would mark the first time the federal government had set a national standard for so-called renewables.

If enacted, the measure would mandate that utilities generate about 15% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Power plants account for about a third of the carbon dioxide emissions — the leading contributor to global warming — in the United States.

"We are turning toward the future," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco), who has made legislation to combat global warming a priority. "This beautiful planet is God's gift to us. We have a moral responsibility to preserve it."

The renewable-energy bill passed 241-172, with 26 Republicans joining Democrats on Saturday to back the new standard. The tax package passed 221-189, with nine Republicans joining Democrats.

The California delegation split along party lines, with Democrats voting in favor and Republicans opposed. Reps. Duncan Hunter (R-El Cajon) and Tom Lantos (D-Burlingame) did not vote.

The House energy legislation must still be reconciled with an energy bill that passed the Senate in June — a version without a renewable requirement or the removal of oil industry tax breaks. And the White House had threatened a veto, criticizing the bill Friday as failing to address high energy costs or promote domestic energy production.

But the measure marks a dramatic turn for U.S. energy policy and is a sharp contrast to the energy bill passed in 2005 by the Republican-controlled Congress.

That legislation emphasized greater production of traditional energy sources, such as coal, oil and nuclear power.

The House bill is the counterpart to the Senate's energy legislation, which passed in June and contains provisions to increase the average-fuel-efficiency requirements for cars for the first time in nearly two decades.
[Read More]
__________________
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it.
- Mahatma Gandhi


Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 10:21 AM
tarabell tarabell is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Vehicles: 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,256
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

Follow-up to article:

Quote:
Here is a comparison of highlights in the energy legislation passed Saturday by the House and the bill approved by the Senate in June. The two will have to be merged.

TAXES

-- House calls for $16 billion in new taxes on oil companies over 10 years by removing several of the industry's tax breaks. Senate bill has no tax provisions.

RENEWABLE ENERGY

-- House calls for incentives to build biomass factories and for research into cellulosic ethanol and biodiesel. Senate has similar provisions.

-- House requires electric utilities to produce 15 percent of electricity from renewable energy sources. Senate has no such requirement.

ENERGY CONSERVATION

-- House has new efficiency standards for appliances, lighting and buildings, and creates bonds to be used by cities and counties for energy conservation. Senate has appliance and lighting efficiency standards.

AUTOMOBILE FUEL ECONOMY

--House bill has nothing on automobile fuel economy. Senate bill increases auto mileage requirement to 35 mpg by 2020 for cars, SUVs and small trucks, about a 40 percent increase.

ETHANOL

-- House bill has no mandate on ethanol use as a replacement for gasoline. Senate requires a sevenfold increase in ethanol use to 36 billion gallons a year by 2022.

-- House provides tax credits for installing E-85 pumps. Senate requires half of new cars manufactured by 2015 be capable of running on E-85.

HYBRID CARS

-- House provides tax breaks, subsidies for research into better batteries for plug-in hybrid cars and up to $4,000 tax credit for purchasing such cars. Senate provides loan guarantees and other assistance for advanced diesel and hybrid battery technology.

CARBON DIOXIDE

-- House calls for an assessment of areas for underground carbon dioxide storage and calls for developing large-scale storage demonstration projects. Senate has similar provision.

ENERGY PRICE GOUGING

-- House bill has no provision. Senate makes it unlawful to charge an "unconscionably excessive" price for oil products, including gasoline.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/wa...y_legislation/
__________________
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it.
- Mahatma Gandhi


Reply With Quote
  #3   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 10:28 AM
mparrish's Avatar
mparrish mparrish is offline
Rosie the Riveter Redux
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 2007 Prius
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,227
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

Doesn't mention a likely Republican veto.

"They still faced a steady barrage of criticism from House Republicans — and some Democrats — who complained that the legislation did not support the domestic coal, oil and nuclear industries."

Leave climate/environmental issues on the side for now. U.S. proven reserves are only enough to last 3 years without imports. There is simply no way to supply our way out to have any significant impact on oil imports. And these legislators know it. But the corporate gravy train is a beautiful, beautiful siren song that they must obey.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 10:57 AM
Bucko Bucko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicles: 2001 Chevy Prizm Manual 5 speed
Location: Monroe Michigan
Posts: 207
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

15% renewable electrical energy is rather agressive. I believe that the US doesn't currently produce much more than 15% with all the Nuke plants and probably not much more than 1% with the current wind and solar generation. And with the 'not in my backyard' mentality, good luck getting enough land to do either. A 1000-1500 MW Nuke or Coal plant with modern clean technologys take up alot less space, and are usually built on land the the utilities already own. There would have to be a reason to build additional generation (wind, solar or other) in an area as well, if there isn't much growth, then there is no incentive to spend the money for construction.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 12:14 PM
aca2983 aca2983 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2000 Protege ES
Location: Alexandria VA
Posts: 978
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

"House requires electric utilities to produce 15 percent of electricity from renewable energy sources. Senate has no such requirement."

The most common interpretation of this clause is that most people will think of windmills or solar farms or renewable fuels, but I would like to see the emphasis switched around so that there is increased incentive on harnessing the acres of rooftop space that could be utilized for PV panels. Hopefully this 15% requirement, if passed, gets translated into incentives for consumers.

This would put the focus not on vast utilities, but on individuals (and businesses, and municipalities) who can install panels on their homes, and have a personal stake in the issue. Solar is not perfect, but it's good. My house is perfectly oriented for PV panels, I'm just waiting until it's time for a new roof so I can do it all at once, and perhaps a few more tax breaks to help offset the cost.
__________________


I still miss my 83 Civic.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 12:20 PM
HCHCIN HCHCIN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicles: 2007 HCHII
Location: East Midwest/Southwestern Northeast
Posts: 283
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

Quote:
ENERGY PRICE GOUGING

-- House bill has no provision. Senate makes it unlawful to charge an "unconscionably excessive" price for oil products, including gasoline.
I really wish politicians were forced to take a basic microeconomics course. There is no such thing as price gouging in competitive markets. If demand exists at a certain price, suppliers would be foolish to accept anything but that price. If the price is "too high," there won't be any demand and suppliers will be forced to lower their prices until they can sell it.

Besides, what/who defines "unconscionably excessive"? It seems that's a moving target judgment call, and only something that can be determined after the fact -- which certainly wouldn't stand up in court. --RN
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 01:37 PM
Earthling's Avatar
Earthling Earthling is offline
Trying to be kind to Mother Earth
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicles: '07 Prius, '10 Focus, '03 BMW R1150RT
Location: Somewhere, NY
Posts: 2,886
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

SUV's and other gas-hogs drive up the price of gasoline. It's a simple case of supply and demand. Yet I don't hear anyone blaming the true culprits of high gasoline prices: the American consumer, and his irrational and selfish preference for gas hogs.

Harry
Reply With Quote
  #8   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 02:23 PM
Bucko Bucko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicles: 2001 Chevy Prizm Manual 5 speed
Location: Monroe Michigan
Posts: 207
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by aca2983 View Post
"House requires electric utilities to produce 15 percent of electricity from renewable energy sources. Senate has no such requirement."

The most common interpretation of this clause is that most people will think of windmills or solar farms or renewable fuels, but I would like to see the emphasis switched around so that there is increased incentive on harnessing the acres of rooftop space that could be utilized for PV panels. Hopefully this 15% requirement, if passed, gets translated into incentives for consumers.

This would put the focus not on vast utilities, but on individuals (and businesses, and municipalities) who can install panels on their homes, and have a personal stake in the issue. Solar is not perfect, but it's good. My house is perfectly oriented for PV panels, I'm just waiting until it's time for a new roof so I can do it all at once, and perhaps a few more tax breaks to help offset the cost.
Actually thats kind of what I was thinking too, I don't believe that it would work without a distributed Wind/Solar system at the consumer level.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-06-2007, 08:53 PM
ILAveo ILAveo is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 03 Ranger(mostly), 07 Aveo(sometimes), 96 Taurus(occasionally), 01 saturn SL1 (rarely)
Location: NW IL
Posts: 2,759
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucko View Post
15% renewable electrical energy is rather agressive. I believe that the US doesn't currently produce much more than 15% with all the Nuke plants and probably not much more than 1% with the current wind and solar generation.
.....
..... There would have to be a reason to build additional generation (wind, solar or other) in an area as well, if there isn't much growth, then there is no incentive to spend the money for construction.
I think we're currently at about 11% with the biggest chunk being hydroelectric. World wide I think the figure is around 20%. It doesn't seem that aggressive to me.

I don't know details of proposed implementation, but I'm guessing utilities would be allowed to swap credits, so that utilitlies with bad hydro/wind locations could in effect pay places with good hydro/wind sites to develop them.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 08-07-2007, 10:28 PM
Kingsly's Avatar
Kingsly Kingsly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicles: BMW 325i (KIA), BMW 318i
Posts: 63
Re: House Approves Clean Energy Bill

Quote:
[...]passed legislation that would require the nation's utilities to generate more electricity from clean-energy sources, such as the wind and the sun.

And in another indicator of the changed political landscape on Capitol Hill, they stripped the oil and gas industries of $16 billion in tax incentives and voted to apply those tax breaks to efforts to spur production of cleaner forms of energy.
Woo hoo!
[/Homer simpson]
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
California Leads in Energy Conservation. Chuck In the News 1 12-11-2007 11:45 AM
Clean Energy Vote in House 1-18-07 CitrusInsighter Legislation 2 01-24-2007 08:34 AM
Renewable Energy Conference with $17.5 Million for Biofuels Research & Development. xcel In the News 0 10-21-2006 10:50 PM
Press Roundtable - U.S. Energy Secretary Bodman & U.S. Agriculture Secretary Johanns xcel In the News 2 09-10-2006 02:03 PM
Clean Tech Open Challenges Californians to Compete for Green. xcel In the News 0 03-22-2006 10:23 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2013, Clean MPG LLC. All Rights Reserved.