User Name Password    
CleanMPG, Learn to raise fuel economy and lower emissions in whatever you drive.  
MENU
• What is hypermiling? •
CleanMPG to AAA:
• Hypermiling Rebuttal •
 
Home
CleanMPG Staff
Articles
Fuel Economy Forums
      • Register
Go Hypermiling!

   Car Reviews:

2013 Elantra GT

2013 Elantra Coupe

2013 Lexus ES 300h

2013 Mazda CX-5


2013 Lexus GS 450h

2012 Prius c

2013 Malibu Eco

2012 Hyundai Accent
   Bike and Gear Reviews:

HTC Thunderbolt

2010 R 1200 GS (A)

Kawasaki KLX250SF

Zero S


Aerostich Darien

Shoei Hornet DS

Honda CRF230L

Yamaha XT250


More Reviews
Gallery
Mileage Logs
 
CleanMPG Store
 
Calendar
Glossary
Garage
Files
 
Research
Related Sites
 
Archives
Arcade
 
Monthly Fuel Efficient •
Vehicle Sales Figures


ScanGauge with X-Gauge: $159.95

Pre-programming, a CleanMPG laser cut decal, and shipping included!



Even better value for members only is available in the latest SG-II w/ X-Gauge Group Buy purchase thread.



While we strive to provide only the highest quality information through our members' offerings, if you find the information provided valuable, please consider a donation so that we can offer an even better experience for the membership and guests well into the future.

Thank you

-Wayne Gerdes
Owner/Admin
CleanMPG



Home Fuel Economy Forums Gallery Mileage Logs

FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   CleanMPG Forums » Information » In the News


In the News News items that may be of interest. These show up on the front page.
Only Moderators may start threads, but anyone can respond to them.

Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.

Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 03:15 PM
xcel's Avatar
xcel xcel is offline
PZEV, there's nothing like it :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicles: Accord, Ranger, and anything else ;)
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 42,659
EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

The new injection systems and turbo’s appear to be taking the torture tests in stride.

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/Ford_EcoBoosted_3_5L_on_the_test_stand.jpg
Wayne Gerdes – CleanMPG – Feb. 27, 2009

Ford's EcoBoost engine on the test stand in Dearborn. The technology combines direct injection and turbo-charging and is the cornerstone of Ford's commitment to deliver affordable fuel economy for millions. Unfortunately, the new EcoBoosted 3.5L is not set to deliver on that promise but future smaller displacement engines will.

Dearborn, MI -- The arrival of the 3.5-liter EcoBoosted V-6 engine is at hand. The performance oriented and EcoBoosted 3.5L is tuned to provide customers power but without sacrificing fuel economy. Arriving in the 2010 Lincoln MKS, MKT and Ford Flex and Taurus SHO models this summer, the twin-turbocharged, direct-injection 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 engine delivers the horsepower of a normally aspirated V-8 with the fuel efficiency of a normally aspirated V-6.

To ensure the 3.5L EcoBoost V-6 engine delivers reliable performance and longevity, a team of engineers subjected the 3.5L to an extensive battery of tests as part of the company’s engine “boot camp.”

“EcoBoost was engineered with a relentless, disciplined focus on quality that required a zero-defect mindset from engineers and our supplier partners,” said Derrick Kuzak, group vice president of Global Product Development. “The finished product will represent the best combination of production-ready engine technologies of today, poised and ready to deliver the performance, fuel efficiency and value that customers expect.”

The testing was accomplished through three scenarios.
  • Using computer aided engineering models (CAE) and base computer simulations.
  • In the lab on dynamometers.
  • On the roads in the real world.
Between testing on the dyno and in the field, EcoBoost engines have racked up the equivalent of more than 1 million miles of driving.

EcoBoost Testing

The rigid testing includes 20 individual dynamometer-level tests designed to push the engine to its limits. The testing includes maximum engine speeds and loads, coolant and oil temperature and harsh driving patterns.

The Road Cycle Durability test is one designed to replicate real-world customer driving and vehicle maintenance patterns. For this test, engines with EcoBoost technology were subjected to 1,000 cold starts, followed by sustained operation at peak torque and peak power. During the course of the test, engine coolant temperatures ranged from 53 degrees F to a more standard 203 degrees F.

In total, this single test required 1,000 hours of harsh engine operation, representing more than 60,000 miles of customer driving.

“This was a critical test for us, and the EcoBoost fleet passed with flying colors,” Hinds said of the Road Cycle test. “We’re confident that EcoBoost is ready to provide consistent performance in varied conditions.”

Component Testing

Individual components undergo rigorous proving as well. EcoBoost’s twin turbochargers, for example, are designed to run at a very high temperature – up to 1,740 degrees F. Ford engineers proved out the turbochargers by running them at 1,740 degrees F for 10 minutes and then “shocking” the turbos by running them at room temperature for 10 minutes. The tests were repeated at maximum boost continuously for hundreds of hours, under far more severe conditions than customers are expected to dish out.

“Our testing is far harsher than could be achieved in the real world,” said Hinds. “We test at peak power for hundreds of hours to ensure we can reach our durability and reliability goals.”

Designed for a life cycle of 150,000 miles or 10 years, EcoBoost’s turbochargers feature water-cooled bearing jackets. This architecture is designed to prevent oil “coking” that could occur in previous-generation turbochargers.
The new design means that EcoBoost drivers don’t need to observe special operating precautions, such as idling the engine before switching it off.

EcoBoost also endured Ford’s standard engine durability test signoff running at maximum revs and turbo boost for the equivalent of 15 straight days or 360 hours.

As the first Ford EcoBoost engine makes its production debut, it has earned its stripes in Ford’s engine boot camp. It uses that same grade of 5W20 engine oil specified by Ford for gasoline engines, and oil changes are scheduled at the same 7,500-mile intervals.

The new 3.5-liter engine is the first in a wave of EcoBoost engines coming as part of Ford’s strategy to bring affordable fuel efficiency improvements to millions. By 2013, more than 90 percent of Ford’s North American lineup will be available with EcoBoost technology.

Ford’s EcoBoost delivers significant fuel economy advancements without sacrificing the performance customers “supposedly” want. Knowing the difference between what the consumer wants and what they actually use in real world driving are two completely different things. Looking forward however, the entire country is waiting to see Ford provide what American needs in terms of a variant spec’ed in a manner similar to the way the general public drives day in and day out while delivering Fuel Economy in the 30’s and possibly even 40 mpgUS on a combined basis per the 08 EPA. Whether current and future Ford customers want an under 20 mpg combined FE rating with 300 + HP remains to be seen...
__________________
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 04:32 PM
jkp1187's Avatar
jkp1187 jkp1187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicles: Ides of March, 1970
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Posts: 744
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Good article. But do they even have EPA numbers out on the Taurus' EcoBoost V6 yet?
Reply With Quote
  #3   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 05:08 PM
JusBringIt's Avatar
JusBringIt JusBringIt is offline
Be Inspired
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicles: 1999 Dodge Avenger, 1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse 5sp
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 6,182
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

As long as they throw in a tall top gear they'll be fine
__________________
Ricardo

Best Segment: 25.3mi@76.9mpg
Reply With Quote
  #4   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 05:51 PM
seftonm's Avatar
seftonm seftonm is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicles: 2010 VW Golf TDI
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 2,298
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Lincoln is estimating 16/25 for the AWD MKS with the EcoBoost. Not so good, but I still have high hopes for the 4-cylinder versions.
__________________
Regards,
Mike S.

Reply With Quote
  #5   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 06:06 PM
lightfoot lightfoot is offline
Reformed speeder
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicles: 2006 Honda Insight MT, 2011 Prius Two
Location: Essex, CT
Posts: 2,314
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Twin turbo and DI. And people complain that hybrids are complicated?
Reply With Quote
  #6   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 07:07 PM
brick's Avatar
brick brick is offline
Retrograde Orbiter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Vehicles: 2009 Volvo V70
Location: NY
Posts: 4,615
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Naah, turbocharging isn't complicated at all. It was a bit of a gamble in the days of oil-cooled, old-tech turbos (read: the 80s). Like hybrid cars, they have come a long way. My father's car is 15 years old with something like 160k on the clock and the turbo works just fine.

DI is new, but still not that bad. The challenge is in building up enough pressure to inject fuel into a cylinder at top dead-center. But diesel engines have been doing that for ages on much more troublesome fuel.
__________________
Tim

Newcomers, click THIS if you are looking for a good place to start!
Reply With Quote
  #7   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 09:37 PM
FocusGuy77 FocusGuy77 is offline
Guy with Focus
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicles: '00 Focus ZTS
Location: Western MD
Posts: 107
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Doesn't the MazdaSpeed3 have a turbo with direct injection? It was a big deal when they came out with that.

Also, "EcoBoost V-6 engine delivers the horsepower of a normally aspirated V-8 with the fuel efficiency of a normally aspirated V-6." Can I get I-4 horsepower with I-3 efficiency, please?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-01-2009, 10:25 PM
seftonm's Avatar
seftonm seftonm is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Vehicles: 2010 VW Golf TDI
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 2,298
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Yeah the Mazda 2.3 DISI is a turbocharged direct injection engine. Same with the VW 2.0 TFSI, which supposedly gets relatively good fuel economy for its power output.
__________________
Regards,
Mike S.

Reply With Quote
  #9   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 03-02-2009, 12:09 AM
drimportracing's Avatar
drimportracing drimportracing is offline
Pizza driver: 61,000+ deliveries
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Vehicles: 92 Geo Metro convertible 1.L, 3 cyl, 5 speed and a FSP
Location: Corncob, NC
Posts: 2,156
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

It's like they aren't even trying to get good FE. I feel very disappointed in American car manufacturers. We have the ability to make major improvements in FE, reliability and safety, still GM and Ford are trying to produce muscle cars for the average consumer.

What is it going to take to get them to face the inevitable? I would think a 50-60mpg Ford sedan would be the corporate goal and everything else should be secondary projects. Either compete with Toyota and Honda or suffer the loss.

Is this fanciful thinking or is something in the works I don't know about? - Dale
__________________

50.28mpg/457.8miles/9.104g Jan 25-29, 2010 Best mpg.
Want to get better mileage? Read this.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Submit to Clesto Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Old 02-19-2011, 11:50 PM
xcel's Avatar
xcel xcel is offline
PZEV, there's nothing like it :)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicles: Accord, Ranger, and anything else ;)
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 42,659
Re: EcoBoost reliability testing up close and personal

Hi All:

Pulling this one form the dead… Now that the 3.5L EcoBoost numbers are available (Taurus SHO a long time ago and the new 11 F-150 at 17/22 mpgUS c/h), the F-150 in particular has really turned me around on this. No longer does someone towing the maximum whatever with a 5.0 or 5.8L V8 have to settle for the garbage FE when not towing. In fact, the 2011 Ford F-150 with the 3.5L EcoBoost adds "Best in Class" towing performance while also allowing decent for its general purpose when acting as a standard P/U truck matching and even besting many crossover competitors FE while still being able to throw 5-muddy shovels, two wheel barrows, some work boots and beat up wood forms into the bed without worrying about messing up your brand new 2011 F-150’s interior.

You will hear a lot more about this exact engine in that exact platform in the very near future

Wayne
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2006 - 2013, Clean MPG LLC. All Rights Reserved.