|
|
| ScanGauge Anything ScanGauge related is open for discussion here. |
Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.
Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|
Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
 |
|

01-08-2009, 06:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicles: 1988 Ford Escort, 1997 Ford Escort, 1996 Ford Contour
Location: Mt. Pleasant, NC
Posts: 190
|
|
|
Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Does anyone know if it is possible to set up an a/f ratio gauge as an xgauge?
|

01-09-2009, 12:30 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 278
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Man
Does anyone know if it is possible to set up an a/f ratio gauge as an xgauge?
|
You can set up an A/F xgauge for both lambda and narrow band sensors, but the narrow band xgauge is only accurate over the switching range. For example, for a Ford PWM an xgauge for a narrow band sensor would use the following coding that assumes that 14.7 A/F occcurs @ an O2 voltage of .43:
TXD: 616AF10114
RXF: 044145140000
RXD: 2808
MTH: FFFD00020640
NAM: A/F
Half the time it gives strange results, though, due to the MTH approximation.
Last edited by CarlD : 01-09-2009 at 01:28 PM.
|

01-10-2009, 11:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Vehicles: 1988 Ford Escort, 1997 Ford Escort, 1996 Ford Contour
Location: Mt. Pleasant, NC
Posts: 190
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Thanks for the information. You da man. I'll try to get it programed into the scan gauge tomorrow.
|

01-12-2009, 01:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 278
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Man
Thanks for the information. You da man. I'll try to get it programed into the scan gauge tomorrow.
|
Actually, considreing that the A/F xgauge is just an approximation, the following MTH value will eliminate the odd displayed values:
MTH: FFFE0001066B
This should be reasonably accurate as long as the A/F value displayed is beteween 13 and 16.
|

11-17-2009, 09:54 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Hi Everyone,
I'm also trying to set up an A/F Xgauge for my 2009 VW Jetta, 2.5L gas. Non diesel 
And having no luck. I've tried may of the codes on the Scangauge website, and also the ones in this thread but nothing works so far. I'll have the A/F label on the display but no numbers.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
Brian.
|

11-17-2009, 10:20 PM
|
 |
Be Inspired
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Vehicles: 1999 Dodge Avenger, 2009 GMC Denali
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 4,854
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
I also have an A/F gauge setup for my avenger. I toyed around with the sg #'s a bit and this works for me:
TXD 686AF10106
RXF 04410106
RXD 2808
MTH 05B900800000
You might have to switch some figures. My car is PWM
__________________
Ricardo
Best Round Trip: 55.6mpg 147mi
Best Tank: 44.2mpg 730.6mi
|

11-18-2009, 01:07 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 278
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianSanDiego
Hi Everyone,
I'm also trying to set up an A/F Xgauge for my 2009 VW Jetta, 2.5L gas. Non diesel 
And having no luck. I've tried may of the codes on the Scangauge website, and also the ones in this thread but nothing works so far. I'll have the A/F label on the display but no numbers.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
Brian.
|
If your mode is CANLF or CANLS, I don't think any xgauge will work, although I haven't talked to anyone at LL in a long time to see if they've fixed that yet.
You have a wide band sensor, I assume? If so you can get a number for A/F by assuming a stoichiometric number. For pure gas it would be 14.7, for E10 more like 13.8 or so.
At any rate, go to CMNDS and enter 0124 into a memory and hit SEND. You should get back a response like 4124aabbccdd0000. If you don't get 4124 for the first characters, edit the CMNDS memory to 0134 and hit send. You should get back 4134aabbccdd0000.
If you don't get the 4134, then neither PID is supported and you're out of luck. If one or the other is supported, the first or ninth xgauge under the A/F Ratio for All CANSF vehicles should work.
Any questions, just ask.
|

11-19-2009, 10:22 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Thanks a lot for the help guys.
JusBringIt: It tried those codes but no luck. Thanks anyway!
CarlD:
I entered 0124 and got 410D00AAAAAAAA00 in responce
and entering 0134 gave me 413480307FFFAA00.
So with these it is telling me that this function wont work?
Not the end of the world, but A/F mixture would be a cool function.
Thanks again,
Brian
|

11-20-2009, 01:36 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 278
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianSanDiego
Thanks a lot for the help guys.
JusBringIt: It tried those codes but no luck. Thanks anyway!
CarlD:
I entered 0124 and got 410D00AAAAAAAA00 in response
and entering 0134 gave me 413480307FFFAA00.
So with these it is telling me that this function wont work?
Not the end of the world, but A/F mixture would be a cool function.
Thanks again,
Brian
|
You got a correct reponse to the 0134 request, so you have a wide-band lambda sensor and your vehicle is responding to the PID. Interestingly, your value of 8030 yields an A/F of 14.7.
So, the following xgauge should work:
TXD: 07DF0134
RXF: 044145340000
RXD: 2810
MTH: 001C02710000
NAM: A/F
If not, you may have a long ID CAN network.
|

11-20-2009, 08:51 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
|
|
|
Re: Scan gauge 2 xgauge question
It worked!
Very cool, thank you.
I took it for a quick drive around the block and it looks like my ratio is usually between 14 and 15.
So would you mind giving me the abridged version of what we did? Queried the ECM to find if it was responsive to a particular protocol, and checked which type of sensor it uses?
And then 14.7 at idle. That sounds about right, or a little lean, correct?
It will be interesting to see how the mixture responds to real changes in load, and also compare that to my horsepower and fuel economy.
I'm stoked, this is just what I wanted my SG to do. 
Thank you!
Brian.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|