|
|
In the News News items that may be of interest. These show up on the front page. Only Moderators may start threads,
but anyone can respond to them. |
Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.
Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|
The Great Ethanol Scam
 |
|

05-27-2009, 07:46 AM
|
|
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,604
|
|
|
Re: The Great Ethanol Scam
Basjoos,
Yes, I live/lived in cane country.There were cane fields completely surrounding the town I grew up in. They would burn the fields every year before harvesting.
I'll give those diatoms a try.The bacteria seem to be working a little, but I'm still cutting away shotgunned leaves everyday.
Thanks,
Charlie
|

05-27-2009, 09:12 AM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicles: 2002 Ford Ranger (2.3, M5), 2007 Dodge Ram 1500 (4.7 FFV, 5A)
Location: Centerview Missouri
Posts: 2,009
|
|
|
Re: The Great Ethanol Scam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jough96Accord
The only difference I could find between the two is the E85 uses a wideband O2 sensor, larger range of ignition timing and longer durations for injector pulses...
|
Other than the differences you mentioned a FFV also has a fuel delivery system (lines, injectors, etc.) that is designed to stand up to the higher acidity levels of E85. The higher acidity of ethanol is the biggest problem with using it as fuel in vehicles that aren't designed for it.
The reason that E100 won't work in the FFV is the change in flash point. A vehicle can be designed to use E100 (look at Brazil), but the US hasn't gone in that direction yet, partly due to cooler weather (and in winter E85 is actually E75 due to this).
Any vehicle can use E85, but it will run poorly and the higher acidity will cause something to fail. I have seen several people fueling up with it just because it is cheaper. One tank won't cause much of a problem (though it may make an existing problem worse), but any more than that is asking for a lot of trouble.
__________________

The CleanMPG Fuel Economy Challenge
The competition: fierce
The ones scared: gas merchants.
|

05-27-2009, 10:02 AM
|
|
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,604
|
|
|
Re: The Great Ethanol Scam
Wow,
It really shouldn't be that hard to make fuel systems ethanol proof. Heck, just eyeball what distillers use, or what packagers of antiseptic ethanol use(yes, isopropanal is more common, but there is still plenty of ethanol antiseptic at your drugstore).
Ethanol really isn't a harsh chemical like a strong acid or base, or oxidizing agent.
Car corps don't charge much more for FFVs, so it really can't be that expensive to ethanol harden vehicles(yes, I know it is worth their while for CAFE reasons to FFV vehicles).
Heck, many early cars were ethanol driven(granted they weren't very reliable).
I would bet that Brazil doesn't have a huge problem with ethanol cars eating seals etc. It is probably just a question of not using the absolutely cheapest material-spend a few pennies more, and get good material-not the cheapest that will on average last 100,000 miles.
Charlie
|

05-27-2009, 10:38 AM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Vehicles: 2002 Ford Ranger (2.3, M5), 2007 Dodge Ram 1500 (4.7 FFV, 5A)
Location: Centerview Missouri
Posts: 2,009
|
|
|
Re: The Great Ethanol Scam
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoebeisis
Car corps don't charge much more for FFVs, so it really can't be that expensive to ethanol harden vehicles(yes, I know it is worth their while for CAFE reasons to FFV vehicles).
|
What did I pay for the upgrade to FFV?
$0
From what I have seen the FFV vehicles (with the same engine and other options) are the same price as the non-FFV vehicles of the same model.
It's a free "upgrade".
And the original Ford vehicles were all designed as FFV as well.
__________________

The CleanMPG Fuel Economy Challenge
The competition: fierce
The ones scared: gas merchants.
|

05-27-2009, 10:49 AM
|
 |
Beat The System
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 2009 Fit, 2004 Odyssey, 96 Civic retired
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 12,851
|
|
|
Re: The Great Ethanol Scam
It was free to you, but you can be sure it wasn't free to Chrysler. I doubt it was huge, but it wasn't zero. We'll likely never know how much it actually cost, though.
__________________
Andrew

----
100 mpg commute / 90.2 mpg tank = 1191 miles
|

05-26-2012, 12:58 PM
|
|
just the messenger
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicles: 2000 Honda Enzyte 5-speed MIMA, CalPod, SGII
Location: Greater Dallas
Posts: 22,878
|
|
|
Re: The Great Ethanol Scam
Bumping up an old but classic article on the ethanol scam.
__________________
All is vanity
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|