|
|
| Hypermiling Ride and Drive Reports From Locations Near and Far Ride and Drive Reports from your vacation adventures |
Welcome to the CleanMPG forums.
Some posts may describe situations which may in some cases be unsafe or illegal in some jurisdictions. Please use common sense and consult your local laws to make sure you do not hurt yourself or others or break any laws. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view discussions, articles and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.
|
Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
 |
|

12-30-2011, 07:13 AM
|
 |
Super MPG Man/god :D
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicles: 2007 Toyota Prius, 2000 Honda Insight 5MT
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,787
|
|
|
Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Any thoughts on what may be happening here? From the data he collected, it appears the rolling distance goes down when psi goes from 60 psi to 70 psi.; 227.4' vs. 226.3'.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post265379
|

12-30-2011, 07:34 AM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicles: 2000 Insight,2010 Insight,2010 Prius Solar,2012 Volt Premium
Location: Harrisburg, IL
Posts: 5,900
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Change in gravitational pull due to a change inthe the earth's rotational axis.
My guess would be wind change or if he didn't drive in exactly the same track on the road. You know how some roads are sticky in the main path.
Sounds like a question for CapriRacer.
|

12-30-2011, 07:49 AM
|
 |
Super MPG Man/god :D
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicles: 2007 Toyota Prius, 2000 Honda Insight 5MT
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,787
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Quote:
Originally Posted by msirach
Change in gravitational pull due to a change inthe the earth's rotational axis.
My guess would be wind change or if he didn't drive in exactly the same track on the road. You know how some roads are sticky in the main path.
Sounds like a question for CapriRacer.
|
I kind of wondered about that but, the way he did the tests it doesn't seem like a different track would be a factor as it looks to have been done in a parking lot (see link below). Yes, it would be interesting to hear CR's thoughts on this.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eet-19126.html
|

01-01-2012, 07:10 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicles: 1973 Capri - 3 of them, 1998 Taurus, 1987 E-150, 2005 Mercury Milan
Location: Let's just say I live in the US
Posts: 215
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondlarry
......... Yes, it would be interesting to hear CR's thoughts on this....
|
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
Around here it seems to be heresy to point out that the tread actually bulges out more as inflation pressure increases. I think this test is manifesting one of the effects this has.
In order to carry the load, a tire deflects. The formula is: Load = Spring Rate (of the tire) X deflection.
Since the spring rate is largely a function of the inflation pressure, more pressure = less deflection.
As the tire gets stiffer and stiffer, and the tread bulges out further and further, there is a point where the tread shoulders have minimal ground contact, and the bulged out tread (in the center) is doing most of the deflection. Go beyond that point and the deflection is pretty much all taking place in the center of the tread.
- BUT - the spring rate of the center of the tread is a fraction of what it is if the entire tread face is involved.
The net effect is that it takes MORE deflection to generate the amount of resistance to carry the load - hence the RR starts to INCREASE.
And those are my thoughts.
|

12-30-2011, 09:12 AM
|
|
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,533
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Looks like Not much point in going much over 45 PSI-nothing new there
|

12-30-2011, 09:18 AM
|
 |
Super MPG Man/god :D
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicles: 2007 Toyota Prius, 2000 Honda Insight 5MT
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,787
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoebeisis
Looks like Not much point in going much over 45 PSI-nothing new there
|
As I see his results, it looks like the optimal pressure is actually about 60 psi. What's most intriguing is the decrease in rolling distance over 60 psi. 
|

12-30-2011, 09:37 AM
|
|
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,533
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Probably just a measurement problem-hard to have exactly the same conditions.
Simple way to see if it actually does decrease-keep pumping and measuring
Pump it up to 100 psi or so-big decrease??-then you have something
|

12-30-2011, 10:03 AM
|
|
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: HCH 2 / MX 5 Miata /06 Prius.
Location: Grand Forks, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,477
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Rough road surface may be the cause of this scenario? H
|

12-30-2011, 10:33 AM
|
 |
Beat The System
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicles: 2009 Fit, 2004 Odyssey, 96 Civic retired
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 12,785
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
MetroMPG's test methods are some of the best around. I trust his results to be accurate. Confusing in this case, but accurate.
__________________
Andrew

----
100 mpg commute / 90.2 mpg tank = 1191 miles
|

12-30-2011, 01:03 PM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicles: 2008 Honda Fit Sport A5; 2000 Honda CRV A4; 2010 Prius III/Nav
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,813
|
|
|
Re: Rolling distance goes down with higher psi?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
MetroMPG's test methods are some of the best around. I trust his results to be accurate. Confusing in this case, but accurate.
|
MetroMPG responded in the ecomodder thread that the decrease at 70 vs 60 was too small to be statistically significant in his test.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|