Archives




View Full Version : Detroit's Dreary December.


xcel
12-30-2006, 10:05 PM
For the auto industry, December sales mirror the rest of the year: with Toyota surging and nearly every other maker struggling. (http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/dec2006/bw20061229_561297.htm?chan=autos_autos+index+page)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/2007_Toyota_Camry1.jpgMatt Vella - BusinessWeek.com - Dec. 29, 2006

The redesigned 2007 Toyota Camry – Motor Trends 2007 Car of the Year – is on track to surpass 450,000 units sold. This is first time a sedan has sold that many units in a given model year since the Chevrolet Impala achieved that target back in 1978. The Camry is helping Toyota take second place in total sales from Ford this year and possibly beating out GM for #1 in 2007.

The auto industry is on track to end the calendar year much it has spent the rest of 2006: in a slump and observing the stark contrast between the ongoing success of Toyota on the one hand, and the still-plummeting sales and market share of the Detroit Three on the other.

Preliminary figures released last week by analysts at Edmunds.com show the industry at large will be down 6.2% for the final month of 2006, to 1.38 million new vehicles sold, compared to December, 2005. Those results would translate into total industry sales for 2006 of just 16.46 million units, down 2.8% from 16.93 million last year.

Standard & Poor's, meanwhile, estimates that 2006 auto sales will settle around 16.6 million units, down slightly less. According to Efraim Levy, a senior auto industry analyst at S&P, next year's figures could drop even further, to 16.4 million units (like BusinessWeek.com, S&P is a unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies).

One Bright Spot

Year-over-year results like those come as no surprise after an exceptionally difficult year for domestic automakers, occupied by high-profile labor buyouts and high-impact production cuts to match declining sales and market share. High fuel costs didn't help—according to the Energy Information Administration, gasoline peaked just above $3 a gallon nationally in late July and early August, knocking the wind out of the auto buying season.

The singular blazing bright spot, of course, is Toyota. The company is forging ahead to permanently nab the No. 2 spot in the U.S. from Ford next summer and could also top General Motors globally sometime in 2007. Sales for the last month of the year will probably be up by 11.4%, to 218,000 units, with market share increasing to 15.7%, from 13.7% during the same period last year, according to Edmunds.

But that's where the good news ends, for the most part. Other Japanese competitors are treading water. Nissan is expected to be down 2.6% from last year. And Honda, which uncharacteristically misread demand for Civics and the 4-cylinder version of its Accord sedan, should match last year's numbers almost identically.

Ford's Falling Figures

Worse yet, there's likely to be little relief for domestics once all the figures are tabulated in mid-January. Indeed, of the six major auto manufacturers, only Toyota is expected to post any gains whatsoever for the month. The combined domestic market share for DaimlerChrysler's Chrysler division, Ford, and GM is expected to fall from 56.6% last year to 54.3%.

The picture is, by far, the bleakest for Ford. There are indications it could post a sales decline in excess of 16% from December last year, to 210,000 new vehicles, adjusted for one fewer selling days. That drop is more than five times larger than the second biggest decline of the month, at Chrysler. Unadjusted, Ford could be off by as much as 19.6%.

And things aren't likely to get better any time soon for Ford. The retirement of the Taurus, finalized earlier this year, will set the company back by as much as 500,000 units annually. Jesse Toprak, executive director of industry analysis for Edmunds.com, says "Ford is suffering.

Going forward, it's facing a lack of new products and increased competition from General Motors and Toyota."

The Big Squeeze

December is a traditionally strong month for domestic automakers because consumers tend to buy more sport-utility vehicles and trucks, thanks, in part, to worsening weather as well as generous yearend deals. But this year, those sales haven't been able to buoy Ford's results as much as they did during the same period last year.

New trucks, SUVs, and crossovers from General Motors are starting to squeeze Ford in precisely the markets where it makes the biggest profits. Toyota's upcoming redesign of the Tundra pickup is also likely to nibble at Ford's F-Series, which is still the best-selling truck in the U.S. as well as Ford's most successful model. "Going into 2007, virtually everyone is going to grab market share from Ford," adds S&P's Levy.

For its part, Chrysler is unlikely to fare much better for December. Toprak expects adjusted sales to be down 3.1%, to 177,000 units. Chrysler's U.S. sales market share is likely to hold steady, just under 13%, even as it suffers from a lack of product diversity—too many heavy SUVs and just one car that earns over 30 miles per gallon until new models roll off the assembly line over the next year. "Given declines almost every month, 2006 was a year to forget for Chrysler," says Toprak.

New Realization

The one domestic bright spot is General Motors, which is likely to hold its ground on the strength of new products. Toprak expects GM's adjusted December sales to be off from last year by 1.5%, to 365,000 units. But market share is actually up. Edmunds predicts that figure will rise slightly, to 26.4%, up nearly 2% from the preceding month and up from 26.1% during the same period last year.

GM's new pickups, introduced in November, are on an uncharacteristically accelerated schedule. All the variants of the GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado, including numerous body styles and engines, should be available within a short six months instead of the historical 18 months it has taken the company to prepare them. That could help GM further improve its market-share figures next spring.

Levy and Toprak both see one positive development common to all three American automakers. "Domestic brands are willing to get rid of volume for the sake of profitability," says Levy. Toprak adds, "All the domestics now fully realize they can't go after market share alone without minding profitability."

Going into 2007, that leaves industry observers watching not for a sudden surge in new sales but, rather, milder gains: fewer incentives, lower transaction costs, and less discounting—all milestones on the road to domestic profitability.

AshenGrey
12-31-2006, 11:20 AM
The Detroit Three can only save themselves by doing three things:

1.) Stop paying a handful of executives billions of dollars per year, each. Japanese execs work harder and somehow "get by" on just a few lousy million per year each.

2.) Build attractive, efficient vehicles.

3.) Get the quality up. It's no longer acceptable for a transmission to fall apart at 70k miles, or the paint to peel off the car the same day the 36-month warranty expires.


I hare no doubt that gasoline is going to be back to $4.00 by summer. If the Detroit Three are still only offering poorly made, expensive SUVs that get 16 MPG, they will keep losing market share until they are nothing but a niche manufacturer that caters only to rich, Republican wastrels.

tbaleno
12-31-2006, 12:12 PM
Yeah, but dont forget those Democrat soccer moms are going to have to give up the SUVs and stop taking money that could be used to feed the kids and putting it in the gas tank and making the kids eat McDonalds as well.

Anyway. I just got upset because it isn't JUST the Republicans driving SUVs. We are all wastrels as you put it. People with attitudes like "Its the other guys that are bad" are missing the fact there is something THEY can do. Blaming others when everyone is at fault only puts barriers to productive thinking. If you call someone a name and make derogatory statements do you think they are going to side with you and try to find a solution?

This kind of thinking has to stop if this country is going to get anything productive done. We all have to work together on this.

xcel
12-31-2006, 03:03 PM
Hi Guys:

___The item that worries me the most is that Ford is not just a cultural icon but an employer of a huge number of Americans. They appear to be on track to balance the number of employees to match their current production but their new product launches appear to be falling on deaf ears no matter what they try? The Fusion is an attractive sedan but its sales of a possible 135,000 MY 07 is just not in the same league as that of a Camry pushing possibly 450,000 units or the fading Accord at possibly 350,000 for comparison sakes. The Freestyle is all but a failure and the Edge looks good but it is not cheap and is not a guaranteed slam dunk either.

___Ford needs to really pull out something bold like a 1.6L Diesel powered 08 Ford Focus on the Euro Ford Focus/Mazda 3 platform or the Fusion Hybrid as a 10 mile PHEV based off Li-Ion. There current plans for the 08 Focus is a simple sheet metal refresh. The Fusion Hybrid’s FE calc’s do not look promising and the 08 FEH appears to have had just minor tuning to go along with the new Delphi pack and second gen drivetrain. None of this “Shock’s and Awe’s” me in the least and I doubt it brings about a response from the average Joe on the street either unfortunately :(

___Good Luck

___Wayne

Chuck
12-31-2006, 06:18 PM
Detroit simply must bite the bullet and reinvent itself.

The US energy policy has been a bi-partisan failure. If you took every President since Nixon, Ford and Carter have clearly done the best jobs on energy. I'd agree with AshenGrey that the current administration gets the lowest marks, but Clinton was not much better. This would be my rankings:

Ford
Carter (some might argue he is 1st - CAFE is the tiebreaker)
Nixon (Not sure on this one. The EPA, but my memory of this is faded. Maybe this was forced on him by Congress...EPA has not always been great)
Clinton (mandated home appliances to be more efficient, but it was during the last week of his Administration. The large tax breaks on business vehicles in the late 90's that encouraged the jumbo SUV boom was on his watch)
GHW Bush
Reagan (Many would argue deregulation really helped the economy. Encouraging the Saudis to maximize production helped bring down the Soviet Union)
GW BushI'd agree with Tom that our energy situation is a bi-partisan mess - needing both parties to work together to resolve it. I hope for those that read my rankings, it would suggest we had both good and not good energy Presidents from both parties.

xcel
12-31-2006, 08:03 PM
Hi Chuck:

___Remember that this News item is about the US automobile industries woes, not energy policy …

___Good Luck

___Wayne

Chuck
12-31-2006, 08:27 PM
Sorry to catch that tangent, but at the end was trying to say everybody on one level or another needs to be part of the solution, which goes well beyond partisan politics.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.