Archives




View Full Version : Vancouver official scrutinized over Hummer purchase.


xcel
11-24-2006, 08:50 PM
It sounds like the administration costs of the Vancouver Housing Authority might be questionable. (http://www.katu.com/news/local/4717851.html)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/2007_Hummer_H3.jpgAnita Kissee - KATU - Nov. 22, 2006

Is an H3 a responsible government purchase?

VANCOUVER, Wash. - The Vancouver Housing Authority's purchase of a Hummer sport utility vehicle for its executive director has raised some eyebrows.

The organization, which aids lower-income families, the elderly and the disabled with housing, bought the 2006 H3 for $37,000 in public money. With a trade-in, the agency only paid $24,000, officials said.

Kurt Creager, the executive director who drives the flashy vehicle, is quick to defend the purchase.

"We have some physical requirements for the job including four-wheel drive, needs to seat five," he said. "And we selected the best deal."

Creager said the vehicle also makes sense in light of Hurricane Katrina.

"It's a good vehicle and in this weather with flooding and potential disasters, I think it's appropriate," he said. "We need to be able to respond the next working day to any sort of emergency, and that's why we have vehicles like this."

Some who rely on rental assistance from the housing authority think the Hummer is a waste of money and gas.

"It sounds like the administration costs of the Vancouver Housing Authority might be questionable," one woman said.

Compared to the vehicles driven by other local housing authority directors, the Hummer stands out.

"I drive a Toyota Prius," said Steve Rudman, of the Portland Housing Authority, which provides a $400 monthly car allowance.

Rudman wouldn't comment on Creager's choice of vehicle but said he believes it's important for the head of every agency to pinch pennies or at least appear to.

"As a public agency when you are using government resources, I think it's very important that we steward those funds to the best of our abilities," Rudman said.

Creager said that technically tax dollars didn't pay for his Hummer. A local housing fund that earns money on investments did. And even though he drives the SUV for personal use, he added that he keeps track of that and pays taxes on it as a benefit.

This is not the first time that Vancouver's housing authority has been scrutinized. A recent Washington state audit claims the agency spends four times what it should, bringing in $7 million in rent and government money but spending $29 million.

The agency disputes that, saying its own audit found $35 million in net assets after everything was paid as well as a debt this year that is more than $5 million less than last year.

Pravus Prime
11-25-2006, 11:46 AM
It sounds like the administration costs of the Vancouver Housing Authority might be questionable. (http://www.katu.com/news/local/4717851.html)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/2007_Hummer_H3.jpgAnita Kissee - KATU - Nov. 22, 2006

Is an H3 a responsible government purchase?


LOL, let's see:

A: Yes, absolutely. Uhh, nope.
B: Perhaps. Closer, but not.
C: Not really Warmer.
D: Oh Hell No! Ding ding ding! We have a winner!


"We have some physical requirements for the job including four-wheel drive, needs to seat five," he said. "And we selected the best deal."



Sickening. Honestly it's a lame excuse. The FEH, the HiHy can both seat five, go through poor road conditions without a problem, and won't cost over a $100 in gas every week.


Creager said the vehicle also makes sense in light of Hurricane Katrina.

"It's a good vehicle and in this weather with flooding and potential disasters, I think it's appropriate," he said. "We need to be able to respond the next working day to any sort of emergency, and that's why we have vehicles like this."


We? Let's examine this further:


Creager said that technically tax dollars didn't pay for his Hummer. A local housing fund that earns money on investments did. And even though he drives the SUV for personal use, he added that he keeps track of that and pays taxes on it as a benefit.



Ahhhh. The organization allows him to drive it for personal use. Gee, now getting a Hummer makes a lot of sense. He's insecure about something. ;)

I'd bet if Government vehicles couldn't be used (and faced hefty penalties for doing so) for personal use, we'd see a lot less giant SUV's employed.

Wasn't the State Senator from Oregon one of the FEH drivers? (As his government vehicle) I'm sure he'd like to hear the justifications for the Hummer there.

hobbit
11-25-2006, 01:27 PM
If they need to respond to flooding, they shoulda gotten
an *H1*, which is much more capable.
.
_H*

philmcneal
11-25-2006, 05:27 PM
argh, even i drive my little classic prius through waves of water just fine! flooding is the last thing they need to worry about...

xcel
11-25-2006, 05:36 PM
Hi All:

___This story really ticked me off when I found it yesterday and I would like to know how I can get a hold of the offender’s higher ups via E-Mail so as to displace some of my frustration wrt this idiot. Who in the hell needs a $37,000 gas guzzling vehicle to commute in? If he thinks that is good enough for Katrina, maybe a thin the herd type scenario needs to be applied. Here Mr. j@¢k @$$, drive through this swollen creek or river and see how well your 4WD Hummer swims as you are swept away never to be seen again.

___I guess some get mad at traffic and I get mad at pure and utter waste at the expense of us all :(

___Good Luck

___Wayne

Chuck
11-26-2006, 01:27 PM
I'll start off like martinjlm and note the H3 is not the worst gas guzzler, but in politics image is everything (too much, but that's another story...)

I almost want to say he could get away with this in Texas, but maybe not - Dallas just voted out all their judges with Democrats this month.

Don't have to be a big history buff to know the ealiest and perhaps the biggest revolt against the filthy rich was the French Revolution. The Palace of Versailles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_Versailles) came to symbolize resent against the priviliged. It's kind of like the civilian Hummer is by no means utilitarian, but a vulgar status symbol - that simple.

Sorry, it's comically indefensible attempting to make a case any civilian Hummer is the best vehicle for carrying people or things. In his movie, Borat got more than a few laughs attemting to buy what he called a "p***y magnet".



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.