highwater
11-10-2006, 07:20 PM
Finally had to get some new tread on the Insight, after some separation on one of the originals. Got the RE-92’s, same as original equipment. After the alignment story, some interesting observations about the limited service spare.
Had the alignment checked after the new tires were mounted, both with and without me setting in the drivers seat. Nothing changed too drastically with the driver in place. The right rear camber is a little different from the left, which is likely the cause of that tire wearing a little, but it was a front tire that had the separation, and not this right rear.
The rear camber is not readily adjustable so we left everything the way it was.
Here is the print out of the alignment. The initial readings are the car by itself. The final readings are with the driver in place behind the wheel.
http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/522/Insight_Alignment.jpg
For comparison the service manual specs are:
Front Caster Angle: 2°00' +/- 1°
Front Camber Angle: 0°00 +/- 1°
Front Toe-in: 0 +/- 1/16in.
Rear Camber Angle: -1°00' +/- 1°
Rear Toe-in: 1/8 +/- 1/8in.
I had to put the spare on the left front, last Thursday Nov. 02, because of tread separation. My commute went from an indicated 84.1 miles RT to indicated 87.6 miles. This was consistent over the entire week this week. 6 days of an extra 3.5 miles per day. The smaller diameter of the limited service spare is messin’ with the odo, and my logbook:Banane36: . There’s an extra 21 miles that I did not actually travel. The FE will figure out at the pump, but I will have to take into account the 21 miles which is on the master odo, forever.
There has been some discussion here and there, about running the spares on all four corners, for possible improved FE. It would appear that, one would be fooling themselves because of the smaller circumference, and I can tell you first hand, that the spare will not give near the FAS roll out of the RE-92’s, and this is with just one of them on the ground.
Randall
Had the alignment checked after the new tires were mounted, both with and without me setting in the drivers seat. Nothing changed too drastically with the driver in place. The right rear camber is a little different from the left, which is likely the cause of that tire wearing a little, but it was a front tire that had the separation, and not this right rear.
The rear camber is not readily adjustable so we left everything the way it was.
Here is the print out of the alignment. The initial readings are the car by itself. The final readings are with the driver in place behind the wheel.
http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/522/Insight_Alignment.jpg
For comparison the service manual specs are:
Front Caster Angle: 2°00' +/- 1°
Front Camber Angle: 0°00 +/- 1°
Front Toe-in: 0 +/- 1/16in.
Rear Camber Angle: -1°00' +/- 1°
Rear Toe-in: 1/8 +/- 1/8in.
I had to put the spare on the left front, last Thursday Nov. 02, because of tread separation. My commute went from an indicated 84.1 miles RT to indicated 87.6 miles. This was consistent over the entire week this week. 6 days of an extra 3.5 miles per day. The smaller diameter of the limited service spare is messin’ with the odo, and my logbook:Banane36: . There’s an extra 21 miles that I did not actually travel. The FE will figure out at the pump, but I will have to take into account the 21 miles which is on the master odo, forever.
There has been some discussion here and there, about running the spares on all four corners, for possible improved FE. It would appear that, one would be fooling themselves because of the smaller circumference, and I can tell you first hand, that the spare will not give near the FAS roll out of the RE-92’s, and this is with just one of them on the ground.
Randall
