JusBringIt
05-20-2009, 11:57 AM
http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/2/AmericanFlag.jpg "The agreement for a strict nationwide standard for U.S.-sold cars by 2016 took a mix of firm demands and major concessions from the government. Obama sees the talks as a 'template for more progress.'” (latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-emissions20-2009may20,0,7406918.story)
http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/White_house.jpg Jim Tankersley - LA Times (latimes.com) - May 20, 2009
Looks like some radical changes will have to be made. -- Ed.
Reporting from Washington -- It had taken weeks of hardball negotiations, but on Sunday afternoon, White House officials thought everything was falling into place. In less than 48 hours they would unveil a landmark deal with U.S. automakers to impose sharply higher fuel-efficiency standards on new cars and trucks.
Then at 3 p.m., the telephone rang.
A senior Ford executive said the company had run the numbers again and concluded it might not survive if it accepted the deal. If Ford pulled out, it would mean a major setback for two of President Obama's signature goals -- combating global warming and reducing the nation's appetite for foreign oil.
In the end, with more number-crunching and another application of White House pressure, Ford did not bolt. And when Obama stepped into the Rose Garden on Tuesday afternoon to announce the deal with the auto industry and the state of California, he hailed it as a road map for progress on other knotty issues.
Yet the near-collapse of the effort was a dramatic reminder of how hard it can be to break through years of stalemate and build a consensus for action on a problem that has pitted some of the country's most powerful interests against each other.
"Everybody at some point, from California to the companies, had a moment of going, 'Uh-oh, what am I thinking?' " said Carol Browner, director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy.
The push to keep the automaker on board involved a key official on a cellphone who
... http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-emissions20-2009may20,0,7406918.story
http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/White_house.jpg Jim Tankersley - LA Times (latimes.com) - May 20, 2009
Looks like some radical changes will have to be made. -- Ed.
Reporting from Washington -- It had taken weeks of hardball negotiations, but on Sunday afternoon, White House officials thought everything was falling into place. In less than 48 hours they would unveil a landmark deal with U.S. automakers to impose sharply higher fuel-efficiency standards on new cars and trucks.
Then at 3 p.m., the telephone rang.
A senior Ford executive said the company had run the numbers again and concluded it might not survive if it accepted the deal. If Ford pulled out, it would mean a major setback for two of President Obama's signature goals -- combating global warming and reducing the nation's appetite for foreign oil.
In the end, with more number-crunching and another application of White House pressure, Ford did not bolt. And when Obama stepped into the Rose Garden on Tuesday afternoon to announce the deal with the auto industry and the state of California, he hailed it as a road map for progress on other knotty issues.
Yet the near-collapse of the effort was a dramatic reminder of how hard it can be to break through years of stalemate and build a consensus for action on a problem that has pitted some of the country's most powerful interests against each other.
"Everybody at some point, from California to the companies, had a moment of going, 'Uh-oh, what am I thinking?' " said Carol Browner, director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy.
The push to keep the automaker on board involved a key official on a cellphone who
... http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-emissions20-2009may20,0,7406918.story