Archives




View Full Version : Huh?! 4 Cases Of How Tearing Down A Highway Can Relieve Traffic Jams


seftonm
07-13-2009, 06:22 PM
http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/2/AmericanFlag.jpg Here are some examples of how three cities (and their drivers) have fared better after highways that should never have been built were taken down (http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/07/06/huh-4-cases-of-how-tearing-down-a-highway-can-relieve-traffic-jams-and-help-save-a-city/)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/seoul-before-and-after.jpgYonah Freemark and Jebediah Reed - INFRASTRUCTURIST (http://www.infrastructurist.com) - July 6, 2009

Some interesting examples. It doesn't work everywhere, but it appears that removing unneeded roads in some places can be beneficial. --Ed.

Remember a few years ago when millions of our fellow Americans started gorging on bacon and cheeseburgers in order to lose weight? The Atkins diet fad was an odd moment in our culture and probably one best politely forgotten. But one reason the scheme took off like it did is that human beings are innately fascinated by counter-intuitive effects. Most examples you hear about on teevee–”Rock-hard abs without getting off your couch!”–are malarkey, of course. But in certain charmed cases, it is possible to get thin by eating lard, so to speak.

One example is reducing traffic congestion by eliminating roads. Though our transportation planners still operate from the orthodoxy that the best way to untangle traffic is to build more roads, doing so actually proves counterproductive in some cases. There is even a mathematical theorem to explain why: “The Braess Paradox” (which sounds rather like a Robert Ludlum title) established that the addition of extra capacity to a road network often results in increased congestion and longer travel times. The reason has to do with the complex effects of individual drivers all trying to optimize their routes. The Braess paradox is not just an arcane bit of theory either – it plays frequently in real world situation.

Likewise, there is the phenomenon of induced demand – or the “if you build it, they will come” effect. In short, fancy new roads encourage people to drive more miles, as well as seeding new sprawl-style development that shifts new users onto them.... http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/07/06/huh-4-cases-of-how-tearing-down-a-highway-can-relieve-traffic-jams-and-help-save-a-city/

JusBringIt
07-13-2009, 06:38 PM
I immediately thought of why it worked because it happened to me this morning. Individuals trying to optimize routes cut off others on main roads. It's not the entire reason, but it adds.

99LeCouch
07-13-2009, 09:48 PM
Having graduated from the University at Buffalo in Buffalo, NY, I agree wholeheartedly with tearing down the Skyway. It's ugly, dangerous in any sort of wind, and the area it leads you to is not one to linger in. I got lost there one night, and that's one of the few times I wound up my car getting away from there. A vast area of barren industrial wasteland and poorly-maintained, poorly-marked roads. And it's sitting on prime waterfront. I can think of a few areas along there where there would be a great view of the city and the lake if there were some living spaces to see it from. Along with some parks and some more marinas, it would do a lot to liven up that end of downtown and bring people to the city.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.