Archives




View Full Version : Memorial Day Travelers can save 38% of their gas bill with 6 simple economy tips.


xcel
05-25-2006, 03:53 PM
Aggressive driving is one of the biggest culprits in lowered fuel economy. (http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=23475&make_id=trust)

Ford Motor Company - May 24, 2006

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/Ford_Fuel_Test.jpg
Ford Escape Hybrid's head to head.
Gas prices this Memorial Day weekend are 34 percent higher than a year ago.

Ford Motor Company tests show consumer habits have a larger impact on their fuel bill, costing consumers up to 38 percent of their fuel economy.

Based on test results, consumers can save up to $1,056 by improving driver habits and vehicle maintenance.DEARBORN, Mich., May 24 - According to AAA, gasoline prices are a record $2.93 nationally, 34 percent higher than a year ago. However, Ford Motor Company tests show consumers can recoup almost 40 percent of their possible fuel economy by using six painless fuel economy tips.

These tests show that inefficient driver habits alone can sap up to 21 percent of possible fuel economy. In addition, inefficient driver habits and vehicle maintenance can rob consumers of up to 38 percent of their possible fuel economy.

According to AAA, an estimated 31.4 million Americans will travel by car over Memorial Day weekend, the unofficial start of the summer vacation season. With so many travelers on the road this weekend, and countless more family road trips coming this summer, these simple tips can have a profound impact on both the family pocketbook and the national fuel consumption.

“There is a direct correlation between fuel economy and the driver’s behavior and vehicle care,” says Ford Hybrid Vehicle Engineer Stephen Hunter. “These tests illustrate just how much control the driver has over his or her fuel bill.”

Vehicle|Average Test Mileage| Total fuel cost, at $3.00 per gallon|Economy % change
Fusion V-6 (efficient driver)|31.5 mpg|$47.62|21 percent increase
Fusion V-6 (inefficient driver)|26 mpg|$57.69|
Escape Hybrid (efficient driver and vehicle care)|27.88 mpg|$53.80|38 percent increase
Escape Hybrid (inefficient driver and vehicle care)|20.24 mpg |$74.11
For the test, Ford tested two pair of vehicles over the course of 500 miles.

Test 1: Driver behavior increased fuel economy 21 percent

The first test used two Ford Fusions, equipped with a 220-horsepower, 3.0-liter V-6 engine, and fuel-saving, 6-speed transmission, EPA rated at 21 miles per gallon in the city, and 29 mpg highway. For evaluation, the vehicles were prepped identically, and were concurrently driven over the same 500-mile route. The only variable was driver behavior, including the three most common habits that lead to decreased fuel economy:

Excessive idling:

“Warming the car up before departure, or idling for more than 30 seconds, is a waste of fuel,” says Hunter. “Modern cars actually reach operating temperature faster if you start the car and leave immediately. Just shutting off the engine and going into a restaurant, rather than idling in the drive-through, will save you a considerable amount of gasoline.”

For the test, the inefficient driver idled the engine for 20 minutes: a five minute warm up before leaving, five minutes sitting in a fast-food drive through, and two five minute rest stops. The efficient driver started the engine and left immediately, and shut off the engine at the fast-food restaurant and at two break stops.

Aggressive driving:

“Aggressive driving is one of the biggest culprits in fuel economy,” says Hunter. “Just slowing down 10 miles per hour on the highway can save you 15 percent. In addition, avoid jack-rabbit starts, racing full-throttle just to stop at the next red light. Also avoid big changes in speed, such as jumping on the gas to pass two cars, just to get caught in traffic again. These won’t save you much travel time, but will drain the gas tank faster.”

For the test, the inefficient driver applied full throttle at every opportunity, trying to reach the posted speed limit as quickly as possible. For freeway driving, and average speed of 75 miles per hour was set, with constantly varying speeds in an effort to maintain that target speed. The efficient driver applied moderate throttle, and made every effort to avoid unnecessary acceleration or deceleration. For freeway driving, an average of 65 mph was set, with an emphasis on maintaining a smooth, consistent speed.

Excessive air conditioning use:

“Saving money can be as simple as turning down the air conditioning, just to bring the cabin to a comfortable temperature,” says Hunter. “Try parking in the shade so that the cabin doesn’t heat up while the car is parked. If the cabin temperature is greater than the outside temperature, open the windows to let the heat out of the cabin, rather than relying on the AC alone. Setting it to ‘Max AC’ forces the air-conditioning compressor to work overtime, where a lower setting often makes the cabin just as comfortable, but is more efficient using the air-conditioning compressor.”

For the test, the inefficient driver used the “Max AC” setting for the full 500 miles. The efficient driver set the Fusion’s electronic climate control to 68 degrees, letting the system automatically select the most efficient use of the air conditioning compressor.

Test 2: Driver behavior and vehicle maintenance combined increased fuel economy 38 percent.

For the second test, two Ford Escape Hybrids were used. The Escape Hybrid was the first SUV on the market to offer full-hybrid technology, pairing a 2.3-liter gasoline engine with an electric motor and battery pack. As a result, it delivers up to an 80 percent increase in fuel economy over a comparable V-6 Escape. The four-wheel-drive Escape Hybrids used for the test are rated at 33 mpg city, and 29 mpg highway. For evaluation, the drivers employed the same efficient and inefficient behaviors as with the Fusion test, driving concurrently over the same 500-mile route. However, the two Escape Hybrids were prepped to illustrate the three biggest vehicle care habits that impact fuel economy:

Incorrect tire pressure

“Correct tire pressure is critical for safety, and a key factor in maximizing your fuel economy,” says Hunter. “Under-inflation increases rolling resistance, which forces the engine to work harder turning the tires, with an estimated 1 percent decrease in fuel economy per pound of under-inflation. Yet, of the 100 consumer vehicles we recently hosted for a fuel economy clinic, a full quarter of them had at least one tire under inflated by more than five pounds per square inch.”

For the test, all four tires on the inefficient driver’s vehicle were set at 10 pounds under the recommended pressure. The tires on the efficient driver’s vehicle were set at the recommended pressure.

Dirty air filter

“A dirty air filter can have a significant impact on fuel efficiency,” says Hunter. “Like a person suffering an asthma attack, a dirty air filter prevents the engine from breathing properly. To compensate for the restricted air flow, the engine consumes more fuel to deliver the same amount of energy. To keep the engine operating at peak efficiency, check your air filter before long trips, and have it replaced at regular intervals.”

For the test, the inefficient driver’s vehicle used a soiled filter that impeded air flow to the engine by approximately 25 percent. The efficient driver’s vehicle was equipped with a new, clean air filter for maximum air flow.

Increased drag

“Aerodynamic drag is a measure of how hard the wind pushes back on a moving vehicle,” says Hunter. “As the drag increases, so does the amount of fuel required to maintain a constant speed. Avoid anything that increases the wind drag, such as cargo toppers or bug deflectors. As a general rule, if an aftermarket item increases the wind noise heard inside the vehicle, it’s also increasing your fuel consumption.”

For the test, the inefficient driver’s vehicle was equipped with an 8 cubic-foot cargo topper on the roof rack, and a pair of bicycles on a hitch-mounted rack. The efficient driver’s vehicle was equipped with a pair of bicycles on the roof rack, and an 8 cubic-foot cargo container strapped to a hitch-mounted cargo platform. Although both vehicles carry the same amount of cargo, placing the bicycles on the roof causes much less wind drag than the roof-mounted cargo topper.

“This fuel economy test shows how much impact the consumers can have on their own fuel economy,” says Hunter. “Although the amount of impact will differ on every vehicle, these six tips will benefit every driver, and every vehicle. And, if you extend that fuel economy over a full year, your gas savings can be significant.”

Using the Fusion test results, a driver covering 500 miles a week for a year could save $523.64 in gas over the course of a year just by modifying driving style (total fuel cost multiplied by 52 weeks per year). Using the Escape Hybrid test results, improving driver habits and vehicle maintenance could save $1,056.12 per year.

For more fuel saving tips and statistics, consumers can go to www.drivingskillsforlife.com, and click on the Eco-Driving module.

About Ford Motor Company

Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn, Mich., manufactures and distributes automobiles in 200 markets across six continents. With about 300,000 employees and 108 plants worldwide, the company’s core and affiliated automotive brands include Aston Martin, Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Lincoln, Mazda, Mercury and Volvo. Its automotive-related services include Ford Motor Credit Company. For more information regarding Ford’s products, please visit www.ford.com.

brick
05-25-2006, 04:04 PM
Ha. Clearly, AAA needs to hire Wayne and Gary as "The Efficient Driver" for a repeat of this test.

xcel
05-25-2006, 04:48 PM
Hi Tim:

___Except the report would probably still be waiting to be finished? Gary and I would have not yet arrived at the destination because we would be finding and driving roads with 35 mph and under limits :D

___Good Luck

___Wayne

johnf514
05-25-2006, 05:05 PM
Not a bad article, actually. I don't understand why folks can't do use some of the simplest of techniques. Easy things like light(er) acceleration, coasting to a red light, and keeping an even, moderate speed. Not only are they simple techniques, they are common sense.

For example, I had a guy in an Infiniti honking and flashing his brights on my rear bumper at me as I coasted up to a red stop light. I first I thought he wanted to get into the left turn lane (I was in the left lane). However, he stayed behind me! I got over into the right lane immediately afterwards, but while is it necessary to get to the next stop FASTER than the next person?

Is this a flaw in American culture or a society quirk? I've talked to folks abroad, and while aggressive driving does exist, it isn't in such an utterly stupid and senseless form. Not that it is classy, either ;)

*Educated French man tailgating* "Zis iz madness!" :p

philmcneal
05-25-2006, 06:33 PM
^ yeah John welcome to the real world kek.

Still the only bottleneck from preventing us from reaching our potenial.

phoebeisis
05-25-2006, 07:45 PM
I learned the roof basket-cargo carrier the hard way;anything on the roof is a kiss of death for hy fuel economy.
We have made 11 roundtrips from New Orleans to Flagstaff AZ over the last 7 years.Seven of the trips were in a Honda Pilot.
The first two trips were done with a roof basket-Yakima loadwarrier-with about 18" of "stuff" in the 39" width.We were driving about 65-75 mph.Maybe 5% was roadwork.All the trips were about the same-70mpg on the interstates in La and TX,74mph interstates in NM,AZ, and about 65 mph on Rt 287 for 600 miles of the 3000 total.I carried MTBs on a hitch carrier every trip.Our load was probably 1000+ lbs each time
3 adult sized people- two 75 lbs dogs, one or two mtbs hitch carrier, ice chest,small TV, usual junk. Easily 1000 lbs(the receiver is probably 70lbs by itself.

First trip-roofbasket with about 5 sq ft of frontal area- 15.9 mpg!!! (EPA is 22hy)
Second trip-roofbasket same 5 sq ft of roof basket 16.1 mpg.

I couldn't take using 190 gallons even though gas was cheap-maybe $1.50/gal. I built a plywood carrier that I could suspend ,along with 2 MTBs,from the swingout bike carrier .We needed a swing out carrier because of the dogs(they get in and out through the hatch,not the doors).
Third trip-no roof basket 22.25 mpg!!-about 135 gallons-saved 55 gallons.Gas was still cheap-it was the summer 2004.The carrier costs about $40 for plywood,1x4,bolts,eyebolts, etc to stretch a net and ropes over the cargo.
Fourth trip -no carrier 22.4 mpg-same story.
We traveled about 40% farther per gallon by losing the roof basket!
My guess is that the Pilot has about 36 ft frontal area-a CD of .33(just a guess to make the math easy). The Pilot's effective frontal area is 12 sq ft-the basket was about 5 sq ft with a CD of 1 or maybe even worse..
The basket added about 41% more frontal area.Now subtracting that shouldn't improve the mpg by 40%, like it did because aero drag is maybe 60% of the energy used at 70mph. We dropped that .6 by .4-so the improvement should have been more like 24% better-not 40% better. Maybe it not only had a CD of 1, but maybe it actually fouled up the CD of the Pilot.Not sure why it was so much better, but don't stick anything on the roof!
We are leaving again for Flagstaff(in a week).Debating taking the Prius.There are just 2 of us(wife) one leggy dog,and one kitten. We sleep and drive enroute;driving straight through(25 -30 hr trip time).The Prius has enougn internal length to sleep(about 69", if you plywood and foam over the space between the front seats and the folded rear seats.). One of the few benefits of being short-5'5" is it is easier to sleep in smallish spaces. It doesn't have a lot of overhead room-maybe 27" at the peak.
Has anyone done a long trip with 2 adults and a fair amount of cargo in the Prius?Any tips?I would use a trunk rack for a bike.It will cost me ~ .2 gallons/hr at 66 mph(about 6 mpg maybe). I have reason to think it cost that much on the Pilot-last trip(evacuation) without bikes in the rack got 24mpg.However there was a lot of road work(45 mph zones) that improved the mpg,so I'm not confident about the 24 mpg..
Any hints on Prius travel?Sorry to step on the thread. Any hints on mpg at 70 mph with a bike on a trunk rack?XCEL-you had a MDX-nice to travel in wasn't it ? Thanks,Charlie
PS One of the blessing of driving to get good mpg is that road work zones are "good" things!

xcel
05-25-2006, 08:20 PM
Hi Phoebeisis:

___I actually love to travel in the MDX as she actually does very well in the FE department when out on the highway while loaded up. The semi-lux appointments sure do make a long drive that much more enjoyable. In regards to loading, I am not nearly as loaded up as you are used to but 2 or 3 kids, the wife, and maybe 300 - 400 #’s of luggage, cooler’s, and junk for lack of a better term isn’t a light load either? All are inside of the SUV however ;) Just use the same techniques you use in your Prius-II. Keep the FCD in your peripheral, keep your speeds down to 62 mph or so, distance draft when the opportunity arises, Glide whenever coming to a rest area, eatery, or gas stop and just enjoy the view of this fabulous country of ours during your drive. We have the RES in her and there is nothing that will keep a family of 4 entertained better then watching a bunch DVD’s while on a very long road trip. I actually have the DVD sound running for all quadrants for the action flicks unless it’s a fruit bag and then I insist they use the head phones ;)

___I have slept in the MDX, the Accord, and the Corolla and all were reasonably comfortable. The Corolla might have been a bit tight but it sure beat the Insight ;) Never a Prius though. I would think it would not only be comfortable for those 4 + hour naps in the middle of the night but you should be able to nail a nice 50 + mpg at 60 + mph in her. There is no way you will ever approach that in the Pilot as you well know. If it were just the wife and I and 2 pets, I think would take the Prius II myself.

___Good Luck

___Wayne

phoebeisis
05-26-2006, 12:58 AM
Wayne, thanks for the tips. I just heard gas was $3.19 in Az; leaning very heavily toward the Prius. I have a simple sleeping" modification for the Pilot that will work fine for the Prius.
I cut a 10x48" piece of plywood, and put it on top of the 3 extended headrests with the 2nd row flat.I have a 10x48" pieces of dense 2" thick foam I put over the plywood. This fills in the hole between the eat back and the tops of the folded back seats.It adds a good 10" of useful "sleeping" length to either vehicle. It also prevents the dog from accidently slipping through the opening. It won't support a lot of weight of course, but it is far enough forward that just a bit of your head is on it . We have one of those "self inflating" air mattresses that gets about 3" thick; it actually makes for a pretty comfortable bed.
I do the bulk of the driving, but my wife usually spells me from about 1am to 5am.The 4 hour nap (and the false dawn) usually perk me up until true dawn at 6 am or so. During the last trip(evacuation) we took two vehicles, so we just stopped at the rest stops and slept. My wife(me too) can't sleep without the AC (it is hot in Tx in late Aug), so the Pilot idled for 3.5 hours with the AC on.Somehow it still got 24mpg despite all the idling with AC on. I didn't have the bike on the hitch rack; it was in the bed of the Titan.
Thanks for the tips.Charlie
PS-No HCH for me-Pilot,Prius,Prizm -damm,I didn't realize they were all P's until I wrote this. I hung around the other forum for a long time before getting the Prius last month(sold the Titan-kinda miss it, it is hard to stuff Home Depot stuff in the Pilot,but I don't miss the $75 fillups and 13 mpg city).The Titan was pretty good on the hy-21mpg over the 3000 miles.

AZBrandon
05-26-2006, 02:50 AM
Gas is still $3.05 - $3.10 in metro Phoenix itself, but it's under $3/gal outside of PHX. Gasbuddy.com is showing $2.88/gal for Coconino county (where Flagstaff is). For the record, the worst fuel economy I've ever gotten on a highway trip in my Civic HX was 27mpg. That is WAY worse than the 33-37 I would usually get even with 75-80mph blasting uphill from Phoenix to Flagstaff. The cause? A simple ski rack and one pair of skis plus poles. It's amazing what a difference it makes.

phoebeisis
05-26-2006, 10:21 AM
AZBrandon, thanks for the tip.I heard the $3.19 on some radio show. $2.88 isn't too bad; about 10 cents more than here. I wish I had a better way to carry the MTB. The trunk rack carries it a bit high in the airstream; I wish I could figure a way to tuck it in lower and tighter. If I get a chance before the trip, Ill run a short back to back test with and with out bike and rack and see what I get over 10 "kind of" hy miles.
I'm not really up for a hitch rack; I have a hitch rack, but no receiver hitch on the Prius.I just as soon save the $175. I might be able to modify the cheapo Bell rack to carry the bike lower. Thanks,Charlie

PS I get the best mpg out west. On I-40 from Amarillo to Flagstaff there are a lot of relatively flat stretches at over 4000 ft. The decreased drag does wonders for my mpg! Sometimes the winds conspire to get me spectacular mpg;I have run with some very brisk winds and favorable winds outside Albuquerque.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.