Archives




View Full Version : LA Times Reviews Chevy Malibu Hybrid


Chuck
12-05-2007, 09:23 AM
We have established that GM knows how to make a two-mode hybrid. Witness the Green Car of the Year*, the Chevy Tahoe Hybrid, which utilizes a powerful electric motor in concert with an internal combustion engine. Still, GM continues to build its "mild" hybrids, using the belt-alternator-starter system, yielding in the Chevy Malibu a grand total of 2 mpg in city/highway fuel economy over the standard four-cylinder. This option costs a whopping $1,795 and could only be worthwhile if buyers put in for the $1,300 federal tax credit.

To compare, a Toyota Camry Hybrid option costs $200 (over the four-cylinder XLE) and yields an increased fuel economy of 31%.

If I may quote myself from last year, GM's BAS technology is a maximally minimal effort that's more about affixing "Hybrid" badges to cars than improving fuel economy. The salient advantage of the BAS system is that the gas engine is able to shut down at stops, but only if the air conditioning isn't on. In fact, in my two days in the Malibu Hybrid, the engine rarely cut off at stops, apparently because of the state-of-charge demands of the nickel-metal hydride battery. Meanwhile, the electric boost offered during hard acceleration amounts to about 5 hp, which is imperceptible.

My suggestion? BAS technology is not a bad thing; in fact, all cars should shut down their engines at stoplights, and run their accessories (steering, AC) on electrons. But this should be a government-mandated feature, not a pricey addition.

The good news is that dual-mode hybrids are coming in force from GM. The bad news: We're still waiting.

99HXCivic
01-15-2008, 04:01 PM
GM sucks big time, and their Engineering IS NOT PROFESSIONAL GRADE!

They only know how to make big gas guzzing vehicles that look nice.

The Malibu Hybrid sucks big time.

DejaBlue
02-22-2008, 04:05 PM
You know what, Chevy's do suck when it comes to gas. I rented a Malibu and I swear as soon as I went around the block, the gadge dropped. Also, my friend got into a car accident in her Chevy Cobalt and the airbags didn't deploy. Chevy sucks.

moneysaver
05-13-2008, 12:03 AM
I guess whether or not Chevys suck would depend on what kinda car it is and who is driving it. I have malibu...........its not a perfect car but it is comfy and good on gas comparatively speaking of course.......as you can see from my sig........I have done much better than most people with V6.........They caould be better.......but Chevys are not as good as say Honda but much better than people think of them. My $ 0.02..........

bestmapman
05-13-2008, 12:07 AM
I had a Silverado. It was a nice vehicle, well made and dependable. It was just a FSP, so it had to go. But the truck was well made and well put together.

sailordave
06-15-2008, 05:14 AM
Glad to see I'm not the only one here with a 2003 Malibu. I've only recently started hypermiling so I'm only up to 25mpg city driving which is still pretty good for a V6 engine. I think the engineers at GM are fantastic if you can keep the accountants away from the engineering and design teams. GMs problem is product development is full of buracracy (sp?) and once it gets past the prototype stage the accountants take over. Part of what GM needs is a bit of downsizing. Get rid of GMC since their pickups are redundant with Chevy trucks. Drop Pontiac and Buick. Leave Chevy as the working man entry level brand. Saturn is already on their way to becoming an entry level luxuary division since their products are Opel. Keep Caddy to compete in the upscale luxuary platform. Continue to farm products from their Daewoo (cheap small cars), Saab (turbos and all wheel drive platforms), Holden (killer rearwheel drive platforms), and Opel divisions.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.