Archives




View Full Version : A car that could save the planet-fast.


xcel
05-06-2006, 12:58 PM
Silicon Valley's big brains think they can beat Detroit and Tokyo and save the planet … (http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/04/technology/business2_wrightspeed/index.htm)

Michael V. Copeland - Business 2.0 - May 5, 2006

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/Wrightspeed_X1.jpg

SAN FRANCISCO - Ian Wright has a car that blows away a Ferrari 360 Spider and a Porsche Carrera GT in drag races, and whose 0-to-60 acceleration time ranks it among the fastest production autos in the world. In fact, it's second only to the French-made Bugatti Veyron, a 1,000-horsepower, 16-cylinder beast that hits 60 mph half a second faster and goes for $1.25 million.

The key difference? The Bugatti gets eight miles per gallon. Wright's car? It runs off an electric battery.

But Wright isn't some quixotic loner. He's part of a growing cluster of engineers, startups, and investors, most of them based in Silicon Valley, that believe they can do what major automakers have failed at for decades: Think beyond the golf cart and deliver an electric vehicle (EV) to the mass market.

Indeed, the race for the new consumer EV has already begun: Just a year ago, Wright was working for his Woodside neighbor Martin Eberhard, co-founder of Tesla Motors, a startup that has 70 employees and a major investment from PayPal founder Elon Musk, which is building a mass-market rival to the X1. Wright left, believing he had an even better idea.

Beyond that, startups are forming to equip new "plug-in" hybrids that run almost entirely on their electric motors. And around the country, a handful of other exotic EVs are showing up on the road -- including George Clooney's new ride, a $108,000 commuter coupe that's just 3 feet wide.

The more that cars become technology platforms, the more the future plays into the hands of people like Wright and Eberhard. "Automakers can't do this," Eberhard says. "If you drill into the complexity of an electric car, it's not the motor, it's the electronics and battery system, which car companies aren't good at."

Adds Musk, "The time is right for a new American car company, and the time is right for electric vehicles, because of advances in batteries and electronics. Where's the skill set for that? In the Valley, not Detroit."

Wright's garage-born heroics are, in many respects, long overdue. After all, electric cars predated the gasoline combustion engine. But they soon headed for museums, replaced by gas engines. A mid-1990s wave of all-electric cars was short-lived -- GM (Research) spent more than $1 billion to introduce a short-lived electric vehicle -- and were soon replaced by Toyota's hot-selling hybrid gas-electric Prius.

So how do you build the EV of the future on a six-figure budget when GM couldn't do it with more than $1 billion? For starters, you get all the basic parts off the shelf, starting with a chassis. Wright found one he liked in the Ariel Atom, a blazing-fast custom British roadster. By itself, all the hardware in the X1 is nothing new. The X1's real secret is how Wright engineers it all to keep the car in optimum race mode whenever you hit the accelerator.

Proving grounds

Last November, Wright towed the X1 to a racetrack near Sacramento to see how his prototype would do against a Ferrari and a Porsche. On paper, a win seemed guaranteed. But he hadn't yet run the car full out.
In the first matchup, the X1 crushed the Ferrari in an eighth-mile sprint and then in the quarter-mile, winning by two car lengths. In the second race, against the $440,000 Porsche, the two cars were even after an eighth of a mile. But as the Porsche driver let out the clutch in a final upshift, his tires briefly lost traction. The X1, blazing along in its software-controlled performance mode, beat the Porsche by half a car length.

It never occurred to me that I would lose," says Kim Stuart, the Porsche's driver. "It was like a light switch. He hit the pedal and was gone."

So what now? Wright isn't sure himself. Only 50 or so people have driven the car, and Wright has just begun to hold his hat out for potential investors. With $8 million in funding, he says, he is convinced he can put a consumer version of the X1 into production that meets federal safety standards, has a 100-mile range, and recharges in 4.5 hours.

To bring any EV to the masses, of course, will require much improved battery technology. But a handful of startups backed by Valley VCs are claiming that big advances are just around the corner. Menlo Park-based Li-on Cells claims that its technology will double the performance of lithium-ion batteries for about half the cost.

Thus, the X1 and the Tesla could be just the things to throw the EV race into high gear. As battery prices drop and performance improves, the cars could come within reach of a wider audience. And if oil prices keep climbing, more and more consumers will demand alternatives that are punchier than a Prius.

jwbrooks7
07-05-2008, 01:00 AM
Exccpt for the few people who can own several task specific cars, most of the rest of us need a car that can make occasional road trips. A range of 200 miles and quick recharge will be essential. A plug-in hybrid is probably still the answer until technology and infrastructure evolve more efficient options. I'd love to own a Tesla or X1, but it would have to be a second car and have to wait until I win the Lottery. The first plugg-in desiel hybrid is going to sell a lot of cars.

xcel
07-05-2008, 10:47 AM
Hi JW:

___With the performance EV's come the PHEV/BEV’s as family sedans later on. It is only a matter of time imho. Not $45,000 Volt’s of course but maybe $30,000 Prius PHEV’s to start with a lot more heading our way in terms of fully functional and larger sized EV’s in the future.

___Good Luck

___Wayne

hyperboon
09-13-2009, 04:42 AM
Hi JW:

Not $45,000 Volt’s of course but maybe $30,000 Prius PHEV’s to start

I'd rather have a Volt than a car that takes a boat ride on quite possibly the world's dirtiest form of transportation; the cargo ship. With the amount of pollution that spews out of a cargo ship in just one trip makes the Hummer look like a moped.

No one single electric car or alternative fuel car is going to save the planet unless we address the emissions of our "global economy" through these dirty cargo ships. Luckily the ball has started to roll on this issue.

basjoos
09-13-2009, 06:54 AM
A large cargo ship is one of the most fuel efficient means of transportation known. You've all seen that number put out by the railroads of one gallon of fuel transporting one ton of cargo for 430 miles. For trucking this number comes out to about 85. For a container ship that same calculation comes out to well over 2200 miles. True, the bunker oil that most of them burn isn't the cleanest with little if any emissions controls installed, but that's a matter for international regulatory agencies to address.

Of course the whole thing boils down to using local materials as much as possible so you aren't shipping things from halfway around the world. But even if the Volt didn't take a boat ride to get here, how do you know that the steel, plastics (made from oil), and other materials that went into its manufacture didn't?

lightfoot
09-13-2009, 07:18 AM
A large cargo ship is one of the most fuel efficient means of transportation known. You've all seen that number put out by the railroads of one gallon of fuel transporting one ton of cargo for 430 miles. For trucking this number comes out to about 85. For a container ship that same calculation comes out to well over 2200 miles. True, the bunker oil that most of them burn isn't the cleanest with little if any emissions controls installed, but that's a matter for international regulatory agencies to address.

Of course the whole thing boils down to using local materials as much as possible so you aren't shipping things from halfway around the world. But even if the Volt didn't take a boat ride to get here, how do you know that the steel, plastics (made from oil), and other materials that went into its manufacture didn't?

Exactly.

I didn't realize that shipping by sea was that efficient. That probably makes shipping less sensitive to fuel costs than I had thought.

Also, Toyota is pondering building at least some Prii in the US soon, which means that the shipping involved for a Prius may be similar to that for a Volt.

Another thing to think about is "wastage": shipping the parts to build a vehicle (a "kit") may involve transporting significantly more weight (and volume) than shipping the finished product.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.