Archives




View Full Version : Chevy hands ad reins to consumers and gets Tahoe tangled in the Web:


tigerhonaker
04-25-2006, 09:12 PM
Chevy hands ad reins to consumers and gets Tahoe tangled in the Web


http://www.autoweek.com/graphics/aw_spacer.gifhttp://cwimg.us.publicus.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=CW&Date=20060421&Category=FREE&ArtNo=60417028&Ref=AR&Profile=1024&maxw=490 (http://javascript<b></b>:var n=1)


By KRIS OSER | AUTOMOTIVE NEWS

AutoWeek | Published 04/21/06, 9:46 am et

General Motors learned its lesson the hard way: In a world of consumer-controlled content, the consumer can't be controlled.

GM invited consumers to write copy and create 30-second online ads for the 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe. Several of the ads attacked the SUV as a gas guzzler, a contributor to global warming and a warmonger. "Don't buy me," read the headline of one ad.

Allowing consumers to alter or spin content as they wish is an attractive technique for automakers that seek "engagement" with potential customers. But it also carries big risks.

GM shouldn't be surprised that its contest attracted negative messages, analysts say. The automaker insists it wasn't.

Chevrolet spokesman Michael Albano notes that the contest kept visitors on the Tahoe Web site for an average of nine minutes. The contest ended last week.

"We knew when we entered into the area of two-way discussion with our customers that there might be some negative interpretations," Albano says. Chevrolet says it has no plans to remove negative ads.

Some experts say GM should have monitored the homemade ads before allowing them to be posted. "There needs to be … a lot of foresight about whether it really makes sense for your brand," says Eric Valk Peterson, vice president of Agency.com., an interactive-marketing company in New York.

At the same time, if a marketer imposes too many controls on an interactive program, "it's not going to be embraced by anyone who's passionate," says Jeff Marshall, senior vice president of Starcom MediaVest Group, a media management company in Chicago.

"You've got to be able to take a calculated risk," Marshall says. "There are always going to be detractors."

Says Colleen DeCourcy, chief creative officer of the Organic digital-marketing agency in San Francisco: "If you're going to buy a Tahoe anyway, you don't care about the negative statements, because you figure they are made by political extremists. If I'm a dyed-in-the-wool SUV driver, I wouldn't care."

http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060421/FREE/60417028/1024/LATESTNEWS

tbaleno
04-26-2006, 05:56 PM
I think it was a very effective contest. How many people showed the ads to their friends who may actualy be interested in SUVs? I know I showed a few people the ads and you notice that at the end it always had TAHOE in the ad.

Surely with the number of people viewing the ads it must have had some positive effect on some people.

It was a fun thing to create the ads, and I know by going through the images I know more about the Tahoe than I do about any of the other SUVs on the market.

Only time will tell, but I say the ad was very effective.

Chuck
04-26-2006, 10:05 PM
I hope GM took note of the spoofs as a wake-up call they need to offer more than one class of vehicle. GM was the largest automaker because thay offered compacts, sedans, sports cars, family cars, luxury cars, vans - not just a niche of trucks and SUVs. Hope they are honest enough to conclude extemists did not do all those spoofs.

It's easy to automatically dismiss any criticism as coming from those who will always oppose you. It's wise to see if some of that criticism is disgruntled customers. I grew up in GM cars...



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.