Archives




View Full Version : No turbo-diesel at first; engine may be available later.


xcel
03-31-2007, 04:39 PM
Is this heaven? (http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070329/BUSINESS02/703290383/1015/BUSINESS01)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/GM_Europe_s_2007_Opel_Astra.jpgMark Phelan - Detroit Free Press - Mar. 30, 2007

Highway cruising over 100 m.p.h. with fuel economy exceeding 37 m.p.g. Detroit to Chicago and back -- 566 miles -- on considerably less than a tank of fuel.

No, it's the Opel Astra 1.9 CDTI, powered by GM Europe's latest turbodiesel. The fuel-efficient and powerful 1.9-liter turbodiesel in the Astra I recently tested in Europe won't make it across the Atlantic this year, but it may be in the brand's future.

The 2008 Saturn Astra that hits dealerships late this year will have a 140-horsepower 1.8-liter four-cylinder gasoline engine. Saturn hasn't said how the car does in EPA fuel consumption tests, but you can expect it to be competitive with models like the Ford Focus, Honda Civic, Nissan Sentra and VW Rabbit but well short of what the diesel would achieve.
Saturn executives have their eye on GM's European diesel lineup. The brand could offer the latest generation of low-emissions diesels alongside its growing lineup of hybrid-electric models as it works to polish its earth-friendly credentials.

The main questions are how much could Saturn charge for the diesel and how many customers would pay for it.

Diesels are more expensive than most gasoline engines because of costly additional components like turbochargers, intercoolers, high-pressure fuel pumps and extra emission-control systems.

Ballpark figures floating around the industry suggest a diesel that can be sold in all 50 states in 2010 could cost around $1,000 more than a comparably powerful gasoline engine.

That's a big hurdle for a compact car like the Astra, but it wouldn't be a shock to see the brand offering diesels to test demand.

Chuck
03-31-2007, 04:52 PM
I hope this:

(1) brings passernger diesels back to the US
(2) Stops a lot of people thinking of hybrids and diesels as rivals, like Yankee's/Red Sox.
(3) GM would get this in the showroom ASAP to show they are serious about fuel economy. Wish they had mentioned it's mpg at 60mph - 70? This could be the new cutting edge.

xcel
03-31-2007, 05:24 PM
Hi Chuck:

___I think Mark got a bit ahead of himself with the off-the-cuff “37 mpg at 100 mph” statement. I could see 60 + at reasonable speeds with the right roads, driver, setup and conditions but 37 at 100? Europeans best Diesels are more efficient then our best petrol fueled ICE’s but not that much more :(

___Good Luck

___Wayne



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.