Archives




View Full Version : Site Selection Process for World's First "Zero Emissions" Coal Plant.


xcel
03-27-2006, 03:15 PM
Site selection process to determine the host site for the world's first coal-fueled "zero emissions" power plant. (http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/press/2006/06007-FutureGen_Site_Selection_Process.html)

NETL

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/Power_Gen_Facility.jpg

Washington, DC - The FutureGen Industrial Alliance today announced a site selection process to determine the host site for the world's first coal-fueled "zero emissions" power plant. A draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for public review will be issued in the latter part of February 2006, with a final RFP targeted for release in March 2006. Proposals for the host site will be due by May 2006. Based on an evaluation of the proposals received, the Alliance will develop a list of candidate sites by summer of 2006. Information about the process is provided on the FutureGen Alliance website.

The host site will be selected through an open, competitive process. Candidate sites will be identified by applying a set of technical, environmental, regulatory and financial criteria developed by the Alliance, with input from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), independent technical experts and stakeholders. The criteria will include those typically considered when siting power plants, such as access to water, fuel delivery systems, and transmission lines, as well as requirements that are unique to the FutureGen project, such as the suitability of the site geology for permanent carbon dioxide storage. These criteria will be explained in detail in the RFP.

Following the FutureGen Alliance's identification of a list of candidate sites, DOE will use the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process to determine which sites are acceptable from an environmental impact perspective. These sites will be identified by DOE in a public Record of Decision (ROD) by summer 2007. The FutureGen Alliance will choose the final project site early in the fall of 2007 from among those determined to be environmentally acceptable in the ROD. Construction would begin following the completion of the permitting process, with the plant operational by 2012.

The FutureGen plant will use cutting-edge technologies to generate electricity and hydrogen from coal while nearly eliminating emissions. It will also support testing and commercialization of technologies to capture and permanently store carbon dioxide. The FutureGen Alliance has an agreement with the DOE to site, develop, and operate the FutureGen plant.

Prospective site offerors, architecture and engineering firms, technology suppliers and other service providers are encouraged to monitor the FutureGen Alliance website for opportunities to participate. Inquiries from site offerors will be accepted only through the website.

The FutureGen Alliance member companies provide energy to tens of millions of U.S. and international residential, business and industrial customers. Member companies have global operations serving customers in Asia, Australia, Continental Europe, Canada, Mexico and the United States, among other regions.

Members of the Alliance include: American Electric Power; BHP Billiton; the China Huaneng Group; CONSOL Energy Inc.; Foundation Coal; Kennecott Energy, a member of the Rio Tinto Group; Peabody Energy; and Southern Company.

For more information, contact:

U.S. Department of Energy: John Grasser, FE Office of Communications, 202-586-6503
FutuFutureGen Industrial Alliance: Frederick Palmer, Senior Vice President, Government Relations, Peabody Energy, 314-342-7624

philmcneal
03-27-2006, 03:35 PM
wow its about **** time where emissions is a priority when building a new factory!

Chuck
03-27-2006, 04:05 PM
I'd be interested in seeing the results....

xcel
03-27-2006, 04:12 PM
Hi Phil and Chuck:

___Now if a California utility would jump on this offering and locate the prospective plant somewhere near let’s say … Hmmm, where would be a great location ... I could imagine “San Francisco”, I would be all over it ;)

___Good Luck

___Wayne

tbaleno
03-27-2006, 04:41 PM
One question. Why do they have to store the co2. Why not just dump it in the rainforest and let the trees suck it up.

xcel
03-27-2006, 05:04 PM
Hi Tom:

___The rainforests geographical sizes are becoming smaller by the day unfortunately thus the lesser CO2 to O2 conversion :(

___Good Luck

___Wayne

gonavy
03-27-2006, 06:45 PM
In my (very limited) knowledge of CO2 sequestration, the most beneficial and practical siting seems to be near an older oilfield or any field where water replacement is not easy- the CO2 can be used to help force out the otherwise hard-to-pump-out oil?

psyshack
03-27-2006, 08:49 PM
In my (very limited) knowledge of CO2 sequestration, the most beneficial and practical siting seems to be near an older oilfield or any field where water replacement is not easy- the CO2 can be used to help force out the otherwise hard-to-pump-out oil?

Yeah put it here in Okiehoma. We burn lots of coal here and have many struggling oil wells... I could use dome of the CO@ for my planted fish tanks.

Yep,, it needs to come here. :D



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.