Archives




View Full Version : Democrats Plan to Press Automakers on Fuel Efficiency.


xcel
03-12-2007, 10:06 AM
"We want to be part of the solution but we don't want to be the entire solution.". (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902158.html)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/2007_Chevrolet_Cobalt.jpgSholnn Freeman - Washington Post - Mar. 10, 2007

Sales of General Motors' compact Chevrolet Cobalt are down this year. U.S. automakers say their customers don't want the small cars that stricter fuel-economy standards would require.

House Democrats, emboldened to act on global warming, intend to push automakers at a hearing next week to accept higher fuel-economy standards.

The new leadership sees control of Congress as a chance to break through years of industry opposition to improved gasoline mileage. Auto executives are expected to argue that any major increases would cost the industry billions of dollars.

"They have resisted any increase in fuel economy standards for the last 20 years," said Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.). "I want to determine whether or not they've changed their tune, whether or not they are now willing to improve fuel economy and reduce emissions into the atmosphere."

The auto executives scheduled to testify Wednesday before the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on energy and air quality include G. Richard Wagoner Jr. of General Motors, Alan R. Mulally of Ford Motor, Tom LaSorda of DaimlerChrysler's Chrysler Group and James E. Press of Toyota Motor.

Markey said he planned to introduce legislation Tuesday that would mandate a fuel-efficiency increase to 35 miles per gallon by 2018, with a further increase of 4 percent a year afterward. The U.S. standard now is 24.9 miles per gallon.

Proposed Bush administration rules have sought to soften the impact of regulations on the financially strapped industry. The White House plan would lift fuel-economy standards by as much as 4 percent a year over 10 years, an increase that automakers have said would be too strict.

Automakers say the industry would have to spend billions of dollars to change vehicle plans and add high-cost technology to comply with the administration proposal.

"The numbers will never add up," said Greg Martin, a GM spokesman. "You can end up hobbling an industry with little in return."

Automakers are also worried that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Barbara Boxer are taking the lead in spurring Congress to action. Both are Democrats from California, which has some of the nation's toughest regulations over the auto industry.

Pelosi has pledged to make oil independence and global warming priorities for Democrats in Congress. Yesterday she named Markey chairman of a select committee on those issues.

Some House members say the committee was created to pressure Rep. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), chairman of the energy and air quality subcommittee.

Boucher said his goal is to craft a bill on global warming that could win the support of House Republicans and industries that produce the greenhouse gases causing the atmospheric change.

"Chairman Dingell and I are determined to fashion legislation that addresses global warming and do it in a very constructive way -- and our committee has jurisdiction over this," Boucher said.

At Wednesday's hearing, the executives will try to ensure that the auto industry doesn't take all the blame for global warming. "Of all the carbon dioxide emissions in the United States, about one-fifth come from cars and trucks," said Ziad S. Ojakli, Ford's vice president of government and community relations. "We want to be part of the solution but we don't want to be the entire solution."

The fuel-economy debate has been deadlocked for years in Washington, with the auto industry arguing about costs and complaining that new rules would force them to build smaller vehicles that consumers don't want.

"They said the same thing in 1975 when Congress doubled the fuel-economy standards," Markey said. Setting aside arguments on how tougher rules could harm the industry's bottom line, Markey said, "I think the greater threat is that they don't have more fuel-efficient automobiles and light trucks" to compete.

When gasoline prices soared after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, U.S. consumers began a shift to smaller vehicles. Because of the slowing sales of large trucks, Detroit automakers took one of their worst financial tumbles in decades, which forced the closing of dozens of plants and the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.

The United States is falling behind other nations that are pushing for better fuel economy as concerns mount over global warming. Automakers in the European Union agreed to voluntary increases in fuel-economy standards next year that will lift the average to 44.2 miles per gallon, according to the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. In Japan, average vehicle fuel economy tops 45 mpg. China's level is in the mid-30s and projected to rise, propelled by government policy.

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, an industry trade group, is engaged in court battles in California and other states that are seeking to lower global-warming emissions. For years, industry executives denied the existence of global warming and in the 1990s helped fund groups that sought to debunk the science behind climate change, said Daniel Becker, director of the Sierra Club's global-warming program.

Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), a member of the energy and air quality subcommittee, said Democrats in the House are committed to action on global warming, even though the focus now is most heavily on the war in Iraq.

"In view of the urgency of the issue, I think we have to push the envelope," Baldwin said. "We have to push the discussion beyond the comfort area of all the participants and see where we land."

Chuck
03-12-2007, 10:21 AM
... (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902158.html)Sales of General Motors' compact Chevrolet Cobalt are down this year. U.S. automakers say their customers don't want the small cars that stricter fuel-economy standards would require....

They don't want their small cars.

Can anyone name of a domestically-made Detroit-based economy car that was among the best in fuel economy in the last 30 years? They have never bothered to try.

rhwinger
03-12-2007, 10:30 AM
Maybe GM should ask Toyota or Honda for help?

But in all seriousness, why can't this issue be viewed with a higher priority due to the threat that increasing reliance on imported oil has to our economy and national security?

"Sheep are meant to be shorn"

xcel
03-12-2007, 10:35 AM
Hi Chuck:

___When the Ford Focus first came out, it was in many Top 10 lists for a number of reasons including the 2.3L which at the time was in the 32 highway area. Of course Ford let it languish like they do everything else and now it can be found for < $10K stripped on the back of Ford lots all over the country. If they would have brought over the European underpinnings like Mazda did with the 3, it would still be competitive as the 3 is still ranked higher then the Civic and Corolla in any number of Car Mag and online shootouts. What if … What if … What if … To go along with that, the Focus is still a decent automobile with the 2.0e (PZEV variant) and 27/37 EPA rating w/ the stick. I would love to take out last years ZX5 as I have the feeling someone w/ an aggressive mindset could punch though the 50 mpg mark lifetime in one. PZEV, decent FE, larger size then the rest and inexpensive. No side curtain are available for the 07 MY sedans and so so reliability which writes it off for many :(

___The Cobalt always appeared to me to be a warmed over Cavalier which was dated back in the early 90’s. No wonder GM can’t sell em, Dah!

___Good Luck

___Wayne

Bruce
03-12-2007, 12:06 PM
Maybe GM should ask Toyota or Honda for help?

GM has gotten some help from Toyota, and I'm driving the result. It was a pretty good deal, too, since GM's "mark of excellence" made the price a few grand lower than that of a comparably-equipped Corolla.

Unfortunately, it no longer exists in a GM flavor; today's collaborative effort is the Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe.

AshenGrey
03-12-2007, 06:26 PM
I think that there is certainly a segment of the population that likes little cars. The Yaris, Fit, Scion Xa are fine examples of cars that basically show that "less is more". For under $20k, you have three choices of pretty, peppy, thrifty vehicles that have good stereo systems and comfortable seats.

The trouble with some of GM's offerings are that the entry-level small cars aren't all that pretty or thrifty. The Aevo isn't expensive, but it *looks* cheap and *feels* cheap. The Fit looks like a fun car, drives like a fun car, and gets nearly 40 MPG.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.