giannisanag
11-27-2010, 11:48 AM
Hi,
i ve been using scangauge for 2 years. However only recently i started to use it to demostrate fuel consumption. Trouble is that the trip and tank (especially thank) are different to those my OEM trip computer says. After 2 fillups i am wiating for this tank to reach the reserve fuel to refill and compare the values.
I suspect that the difference is in the way scangauge calculates the consumption compared to my oem trip computer. I thin that the trip computer calculates all the time a weighted average consumption where scangauge calculate just the average.
Notes
1. my car is a mercedes w203 c200 kompressor with the 2.0 liter M111 engine and manual transmision
2. I have changed my instrument cluster and installed a clk63amg item
3. the change affected my small distance consumption readings. With the old cluster when i turned the engine on the consumption (average not instantaneus) was 8,5l/100km and the clk item shows in the same condition 11.5. however both clusters are accurate and when i calculate the fuel that I will need to refill i always have the correct number.
Do I do anything wrong?
Today after 140km of in and around city driving I got 10.0l/100km on my trip computer and 10,9 on my scangauge. Sometimes scangauge reads more and others read less.
Greetings from Greece
Giannis
Ps: I ve put 2 fuel magnets and i ve been using aceton for the last 2000km. In my everyday trip to work i never made something better than 8.0liters/100km (with my old cluster) and 9.2 with my new. Aceton dropped the consumption with the new cluster to 8.1 and magnets showed an impressive 7,5.
Accordingly on my way back (much more traffic and up the hill) never did i show something less than 11,5-11,6 but yesterday i went home with a 10,5.
Mind you my car is not a stock one (pulley kit, headers and intercooler gave me 214hp from 163hp oem)
Ps2: i tried playing with the cutoff values to adjust the accuracy but no luck
i ve been using scangauge for 2 years. However only recently i started to use it to demostrate fuel consumption. Trouble is that the trip and tank (especially thank) are different to those my OEM trip computer says. After 2 fillups i am wiating for this tank to reach the reserve fuel to refill and compare the values.
I suspect that the difference is in the way scangauge calculates the consumption compared to my oem trip computer. I thin that the trip computer calculates all the time a weighted average consumption where scangauge calculate just the average.
Notes
1. my car is a mercedes w203 c200 kompressor with the 2.0 liter M111 engine and manual transmision
2. I have changed my instrument cluster and installed a clk63amg item
3. the change affected my small distance consumption readings. With the old cluster when i turned the engine on the consumption (average not instantaneus) was 8,5l/100km and the clk item shows in the same condition 11.5. however both clusters are accurate and when i calculate the fuel that I will need to refill i always have the correct number.
Do I do anything wrong?
Today after 140km of in and around city driving I got 10.0l/100km on my trip computer and 10,9 on my scangauge. Sometimes scangauge reads more and others read less.
Greetings from Greece
Giannis
Ps: I ve put 2 fuel magnets and i ve been using aceton for the last 2000km. In my everyday trip to work i never made something better than 8.0liters/100km (with my old cluster) and 9.2 with my new. Aceton dropped the consumption with the new cluster to 8.1 and magnets showed an impressive 7,5.
Accordingly on my way back (much more traffic and up the hill) never did i show something less than 11,5-11,6 but yesterday i went home with a 10,5.
Mind you my car is not a stock one (pulley kit, headers and intercooler gave me 214hp from 163hp oem)
Ps2: i tried playing with the cutoff values to adjust the accuracy but no luck
