PrinceValiant
02-23-2007, 07:35 PM
I'd like to see automaker come out with a new class of automobiles....a small, very lightweight chassis designed to hold 2-4 people, relatively comfortable for short distances at least...similar to the smart cars that are coming out. Plus, let's make these cars very sparse and affordable...keeping the price down ~5-7G, similar to a motorcycle price, so people can easily afford these for commuting purposes, while still having the family car/truck for other purposes.
To increase both the affordability and decrease the weight, I'd like to see the gov't enact different regulations for these cars as well. Similar to motorcylces not having any crash-standards and the assumed risk inherent with riding, the same could hold true for these cars.
Now, I know that many might find the idea of a car not being "crashworthy" aborhrent, but think about it. One of the downsides to stronger cars has been increased weight...which necessitates bigger engines, and also means the car has to perform more work to accelerate a chassis and also increases rolling ressistance, therefore decreasing mileage.
Make the licensing requirements different and far more strict...restrict power output...these things could help to off-set the risk of accidents. AND just like a cycle, one just understands the increased risk of using such a vehicle.
Also, to increase affordability, I'd more than happily see different emission requirements for such a vehicle.
Again, I know that the thought might be distasteful to ease emission requirements but this is how I look at it; You don't need to assume they'll be "dirty" per se...just ease testing requirements, equipment requirements. Again, this is similar to current motorcycles...which easily cost much less than cars.
And since a small car weighing 2000lbs with restricted HP of 90-100hp or so, you could easily see 40mpg in city driving, 55-70mpg hwy. Much less fuel burned equals much less pollutants emitted...
And since they'd be affordable, you'd see more on the road than current hybrids at a price premium...more of these on the roads, means less gas overall used.
Just a thought...what say you?
To increase both the affordability and decrease the weight, I'd like to see the gov't enact different regulations for these cars as well. Similar to motorcylces not having any crash-standards and the assumed risk inherent with riding, the same could hold true for these cars.
Now, I know that many might find the idea of a car not being "crashworthy" aborhrent, but think about it. One of the downsides to stronger cars has been increased weight...which necessitates bigger engines, and also means the car has to perform more work to accelerate a chassis and also increases rolling ressistance, therefore decreasing mileage.
Make the licensing requirements different and far more strict...restrict power output...these things could help to off-set the risk of accidents. AND just like a cycle, one just understands the increased risk of using such a vehicle.
Also, to increase affordability, I'd more than happily see different emission requirements for such a vehicle.
Again, I know that the thought might be distasteful to ease emission requirements but this is how I look at it; You don't need to assume they'll be "dirty" per se...just ease testing requirements, equipment requirements. Again, this is similar to current motorcycles...which easily cost much less than cars.
And since a small car weighing 2000lbs with restricted HP of 90-100hp or so, you could easily see 40mpg in city driving, 55-70mpg hwy. Much less fuel burned equals much less pollutants emitted...
And since they'd be affordable, you'd see more on the road than current hybrids at a price premium...more of these on the roads, means less gas overall used.
Just a thought...what say you?
