Archives




View Full Version : Landmark climate report: Clock is ticking.


xcel
02-02-2007, 07:14 PM
'It's later than we think,' U.S. scientist and panel co-chair says. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16904988/)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/Colorado_Wind_Power.jpgAP - Jan. 2, 2007

Opportunities to reduce carbon output while still supplying our needs exist in of all places, the wind.

PARIS - Global warming is so severe that it will “continue for centuries,” leading to a far different planet in 100 years, warned a grim landmark report from the world’s leading climate scientists and government officials. Yet, many of the experts are hopeful that nations will now take action to avoid the worst scenarios.

They tried to warn of dire risks without scaring people so much they’d do nothing - inaction that would lead to the worst possible scenarios.

“It’s not too late,” said Australian scientist Nathaniel Bindoff, a co-author of the authoritative Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report completed on Friday. The worst can be prevented by acting quickly to curb greenhouse gas emissions, he said.

The worst could mean more than 1 million dead and hundreds of billions of dollars in costs by 2100, said Kevin Trenberth of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, one of many study co-authors. He said that adapting will mean living with more extreme weather such as severe droughts, more hurricanes and wildfires.

“It’s later than we think,” said panel co-chair Susan Solomon, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientist who helped push through the document’s strong language as co-chair of the report.

“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global mean sea level,” the scientists said.

The report blamed man-made emissions of greenhouse gases for fewer cold days, hotter nights, killer heat waves, floods and heavy rains, devastating droughts, and an increase in hurricane and tropical storm strength - particularly in the Atlantic Ocean.

Solomon, who remains optimistic about the future, said it’s close to too late to alter the future for her children - but maybe it’s not too late for her grandchildren.

The report was the first of four to be released this year by the panel, which was created by the United Nations in 1988. It found:
Recent global warming is “very likely” caused by man, meaning more than 90 percent certain. That’s the strongest expression of certainty to date from the panel.
If nothing is done to change current emissions patterns of greenhouse gases, global temperature could increase as much as 11 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100.
But if the world does get greenhouse gas emissions under control — something scientists say they hope can be done — the best estimate is about 3 degrees Fahrenheit.
Sea levels are projected to rise 7 to 23 inches by the end of the century. Add another 4 to 8 inches if recent, surprising melting of polar ice sheets continues.
Sea level rise could get worse after that. By 2100, if nothing is done to curb emissions, the melting of Greenland’s ice sheet would be inevitable and the world’s seas would eventually rise by more than 20 feet, Bindoff said.

That amount of sea rise would take centuries, said Andrew Weaver of the University of Victoria in Canada, but “if you’re in Florida or Louisiana, or much of western Europe or southeast Asia or Bangladesh ... or Manhattan ... you don’t want that,” he said.

The U.N. Environment Program noted that “for the first time, the report provides evidence that the ice sheets of Antarctica and Greenland are slowly losing mass and contributing to sea level rise.”

“The speed with which melting ice sheets are raising sea levels is uncertain, but the report makes clear that sea levels will rise inexorably over the coming centuries. It is a question of when and how much, and not if,” said Michel Jarraud, Secretary-General of the U.N. World Meteorological Organization.

Politicians react

The full report won't be published until May, but a 21-page executive summary for policymakers released Friday spurred bleak reactions from world leaders.

“We are on the historic threshold of the irreversible,” warned French President Jacques Chirac, who called for an economic and political “revolution” to save the planet.

“While climate changes run like a rabbit, world politics move like a snail: Either we accelerate or we risk a disaster,” said Italy’s environment minister, Alfonso Pecoraro Scanio.

And South Africa’s Environmental Affairs Minister Marthinus van Schalkwyk said failure to act would be “indefensible.”

In Washington, Bush administration officials praised the report but said they still oppose mandatory cuts in greenhouse gas emissions. The problem can be addressed by better technology that will cut emissions, promote energy conservation, and hasten development of non-fossil fuels, said Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman.

About three-fourths of Americans say they expect global warming will get worse, according to a recent AP-AOL News poll. However, other recent polls have found they don’t consider it a top priority for the U.S. government.

But doing nothing about global warming could mean up to a 10-degree Fahrenheit temperature rise by the end of the century in the United States, said report co-author Jonathan Overpeck at the University of Arizona.

Mikesan
02-03-2007, 12:37 AM
So when will a politician have the nads to champion nuclear energy? It's clean, safe, and would provide good jobs to Americans. While we're at it, let's start slaughtering all the cows in order to reduce methane emissions. No more McDonald's, Burger King, or steaks on the grill.

diamondlarry
02-03-2007, 07:52 AM
While we're at it, let's start slaughtering all the cows in order to reduce methane emissions. No more McDonald's, Burger King, or steaks on the grill.

Don't forget about elephants. I hear they are a large producer of methane too.:D Maybe mandate the use of Beano for us humans too.:D

tigerhonaker
02-03-2007, 09:39 AM
This is a very interesting Article. Nothing really New here IMO because it has been said by many as the Years are going by.

Here is something that to me points out what is being said in the Article. This past summer we had Both HVAC units replaced at our home. Reason was the units were unable to "COOL" the home when the summer temps reached the 95-100 degree range. As the recent years have been going by the units just could not perform as needed. POINT: It is a lot HOTTER in the summer months than it use to be. The night temperature is staying HOTTER longer.

Global-Warming is here (IMO).

Terry (tiger)

xcel
02-03-2007, 10:24 PM
Hi Terry:

___There is still a possibility that some areas of the Midwest may be insulated from the upcoming heat. The report I saw a few months ago described a Midwest area cooling island. The island followed the Lake Michigan lake front from Michigan down through Chicago and then a narrowing band towards St. Louis. I do not know if this will be the case or not but as you said, expect hotter day and nighttime highs during the summer months in particular.

___Good Luck

___Wayne

antrey
02-06-2007, 02:44 PM
I had downloaded a copy of the preliminary report but can no longer find the download or link. Does anyone know the link.

basjoos
02-06-2007, 07:05 PM
. While we're at it, let's start slaughtering all the cows in order to reduce methane emissions. No more McDonald's, Burger King, or steaks on the grill.

Over the past few centuries we've slaughtered most all of the wild farting ungulants (buffalo, antelope, wild sheep, etc.) and replaced them with their domestic farting equivalents (cows, goats, sheep). So now you advocate slaughtering the domestic herds to reduce the levels of methane release.

One thing that is never explained in those pie charts of past and present methane sources is the contribution of animal sources. A big chunk of the current methane source chart is taken up by "domestic ungulants", but there is no comparable chunk of methane releases by "wild ungulants" in the past methane sources chart. I'm sure those millions of bison that used to roam the Great Plains were not methane free, much less those herds of mammoth, mastodons, camels, and antelope that roamed the world in even earlier times. And how about the baleen whale population before their numbers were thinned out by whalers. The way I see it is that there was no net change in methane emissions from methane emitting animals. We just slaughtered off the wild methane emitters and replaced them with domestic ones.

basjoos
02-06-2007, 07:15 PM
I recall a number of scientific and popular articles that were published in the late 70's detailing how we were coming to the end of the current interglacial period and would soon be entering another ice age. The articles mentioned that we would have to evacuate Canada, northern Europe, and most of the Mid-West as the continental glaciers reformed, that the reduction in arable land and cooler climate would cause food shortages, and that the remaining cities would get more crowded as mankind was restricted to a smaller portion of the earth's landmass. So I guess now we are on the opposite tangent. I wonder how long this one will last?

antrey
02-14-2007, 11:57 AM
I had downloaded a copy of the preliminary report but can no longer find the download or link. Does anyone know the link.

I found my copy of the report and the website where it can be downloaded was in the footer. If anyone else is interested it can be downloaded at: http://www.ipcc.ch



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.