Archives




View Full Version : ...and the Nobel Peace Prize may go to...


Chuck
02-01-2007, 07:57 AM
...Al Gore for bringing awareness of Climate Change (http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/01/gore.nobel.ap/index.html)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/nobel_peace_prize.gifwww.cnn.com - Feb 1, 2007

OSLO, Norway (AP) -- Former Vice President Al Gore has been nominated for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_peace_prize) for his wide-reaching efforts to draw the world's attention to the dangers of global warming, a Norwegian lawmaker said Thursday.

"A prerequisite for winning the Nobel Peace Prize is making a difference, and Al Gore has made a difference," Conservative Member of Parliament Boerge Brende, a former minister of environment and then of trade, told The Associated Press.

Brende said he joined political opponent Heidi Soerensen, of the Socialist Left Party, to nominate Gore as well as Canadian Inuit activist Sheila Watt-Cloutier before the nomination deadline expired Thursday.

"Al Gore, like no other, has put climate change on the agenda. Gore uses his position to get politicians to understand, while Sheila (Watt-Cloutier) works from the ground up," Brende said.

During eight years as Bill Clinton's vice president, Gore pushed for climate measures, including for the Kyoto Treaty (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Treaty), and after leaving office in 2001 has campaigned worldwide, especially with his Oscar-nominated documentary on climate change called "An Inconvenient Truth (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Inconvenient_Truth)."

Watt-Cloutier won Norway's 2005 Sophie environment prize in 2005 for drawing attention to the effect of climate change and pollution on the traditional lifestyles of the Arctic's indigenous people and others.

National lawmakers are among the thousands of people and groups with rights to nominate Nobel candidates. Others include members of national governments, past laureates, members of the awards committee and its staff, and many university professors.

The secretive Nobel committee never comments on specific nominations, but members often note that anyone can be nominated. Last year, there were 191 nominations for the prize that went to Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank he founded to help the poor.

Other announced nominations for the 2007 prize include Vietnamese Monk Thich Quang Do and Sail Training International, a British-based charity helping young people develop through sailing.

The five-member Norwegian awards committee accepts proposals postmarked by February 1 and expects a rough count of nominations on February 12.

The decision is traditionally announced in mid-October, with the prize always presented on the December 10 anniversary of the death of its creator, Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Nobel#The_Prizes).

In 2004, the Nobel Peace Prize went to Kenyan environmentalist Wangari Maathai, which Brende said shows the award committee's focus on ecological problems as a source of conflict.

"I think climate change is the biggest challenge we face in this century," Brende said

noflash
02-01-2007, 09:20 AM
Well deserved.

xcel
02-01-2007, 11:39 AM
Hi Chuck:

___I am swollen with pride that Al Gore has received a nomination as his documentary was the most prolific piece I have seen in years. I cannot think of anything anyone has done this past year to promote awareness to the planets troubles as much as “An Inconvenient Truth” has and I hope Mr. Gore actually wins a Nobel for his efforts.

___Good Luck

___Wayne

Chuck
02-01-2007, 12:02 PM
It's going to be December before they decide, but this issue is becoming more prominent, so I'd think he is the most likely to get it.

Bob R
02-02-2007, 09:00 AM
Thanks Al, this planet needs some one to step up to the plate! I repair trucks, and automobiles for aliving I've know about these problems for a long time,and have tryed to do my part.I think that's the key, if every body could do their part, it would help. BobR:

Bob R
02-02-2007, 09:04 AM
Im going to hope and pray that he receives the award because that alone will help raise awareness of what we need to do!

TonyPSchaefer
02-03-2007, 07:27 PM
I hope that Al wins. I mean, I hope he wins the popular vote AND the overall election. This time.

diamondlarry
02-03-2007, 09:49 PM
I hope that Al wins. I mean, I hope he wins the popular vote AND the overall election. This time.


Non-paper ballots?:D

tbaleno
02-04-2007, 01:47 AM
I don't think Al gore should win just because he is making the issue political and emotional. I think this is causing a divide and will hamper any consensus on what should be done.

I think someone should win that shows that they can talk about both sides of the issue and understand the objections of the other side and rebut them.

I want intellectual debate, not propaganda and emotion.

I think everyone agrees that global warming is happening. But I think co2 may not be a major component. I have heard cows contribute, and how about all that pavement in big cities? That has been proven to raise temps. Who knows what that local warming is doing globally.

I think we should do something "just in case." But I don't think we should give an award to someone who is causing a divide and alienating a good amount of people.

xcel
02-04-2007, 04:05 AM
Hi Tom:

___Large cites pavement and Cows do not emit CO2 yet the facts are in. CO2 concentrations are rising at an alarming rate starting early in the 20th century and rising even faster as we move into the 21st in particular. More so in fact then the previous 600,000 years as that is how far back the ice cores have been studied. The CO2 concentration vs. average temperatures correlation is so clearly displayed you cannot walk away thinking anything other then WE ARE RESPONSIBLE. Our contribution to the CO2 concentration is not only clear, it is absolutely spooky when looking at the correlation as well as blowing beyond any normal cyclic range. Glaciers are melting all over the world due to the increasing temps and again, the correlation to CO2 concentrations and our continual output of them causing increasing temps is all to clear.

___Al Gore and “An Inconvenient Truth” shows all the above. Without his presentation, there is no Inconvenient Truth and without that, there is no acceptance, which leads to no solution as far as the US is concerned. Thousands of climate scientists have already proven the above but with Big Oil’s and the Republican administrations denial and/or confusion of the issue, many US citizens were unaware and uncaring of the problem until Al Gore starred in this movie. Because this movie promotes acceptance of the problem vs. the previous 3 Republican administrations denial of such, the planet still has a chance. We all know about Global Warming and we all need to get on the problem to solve it. That means the US, China and India starting yesterday.

___Good Luck

___Wayne

Chuck
02-04-2007, 09:54 AM
Careful, he did invent the internet. :D :p

There is not a lot I agree with Al Gore in general, but he got it right on Global Warming. A number of ex-Presidents and other politicians that had either premature or upleasant endings (Nixon and Carter for instance) seem to have worked harder to redefine themselves....and their legacy. His movie was good.

I think America is catching up with the rest of the world that Climate Change is not a partisan issue. For instance, David Cameron would be Britain's next Prime Minister if the Tories win - he drives a Prius and has addressed green issues, as Gov Schwartzegger in California.

______________________________________

I agree that most of the warming recently is man-made. I might quibble just a little bit on livestock - the primary pollutant in New Zealand. Correct me if I'm wrong, but methane is a greenhouse gas - that's what the sheep are producing. In fact, methane may have been suggested to terraform Mars, because it heats the atmosphere more effectively than CO2.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.