Archives




View Full Version : California may ban conventional lightbulbs by 2012.


brick
01-31-2007, 06:16 PM
CFL’s mandatory? Its about time. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070131/sc_nm/energy_california_lightbulbs_dc;_ylt=AiuDjvNchsvtibJMAE.v3BvMWM0F;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MzV0MTdmBHNlYwM3NTM-)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/CFL_Bulb.jpgBernie Woodall - Reuters - Jan. 30, 2007

LOS ANGELES - A California lawmaker wants to make his state the first to ban incandescent lightbulbs as part of California's groundbreaking initiatives to reduce energy use and greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

The "How Many Legislators Does it Take to Change a Lightbulb Act" would ban incandescent lightbulbs by 2012 in favor of energy-saving compact fluorescent lightbulbs.

"Incandescent lightbulbs were first developed almost 125 years ago, and since that time they have undergone no major modifications," California Assemblyman Lloyd Levine said on Tuesday.

"Meanwhile, they remain incredibly inefficient, converting only about 5 percent of the energy they receive into light."

Levine is expected to introduce the legislation this week, his office said.

If passed, it would be another pioneering environmental effort in California, the most populous U.S. state. It became the first state to mandate cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, targeting a 25 percent reduction in emissions by 2020.

Compact fluorescent lightbulbs (CFLs) use about 25 percent of the energy of conventional lightbulbs.
Many CFLs have a spiral shape, which was introduced in 1980. By 2005, about 100 million CFLs were sold in the United States, or about 5 percent of the 2-billion-lightbulb market, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

That number could more than double this year. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. alone wants to sell 100 million CFLs at its stores by the end of 2007, the world's biggest retailer said in November.

While it will not give opinion on the possible California law, the EPA recommends CFLs.

"They save money and energy," EPA spokeswoman Enesta Jones said. "They are more convenient than other alternatives and come in different sizes and shapes to fit almost any fixture."

Also, CFLs generate 70 percent less heat than incandescent lights, Jones said.

About a fifth of the average U.S. home's electricity costs pays for lighting, which means even if CFLs initially cost more than conventional lightbulbs, consumers will save, Jones said.

A 20-watt CFL gives as much light as a 75-watt conventional bulb, and lasts 13 times longer, according to the Rocky Mountain Institute, a nonprofit group studying energy issues.

Southern California Edison, an Edison International subsidiary and one of the state's biggest utilities, runs a program that cuts the cost of a CFL by $1 to $2.50. In the past year, SCE has helped consumers buy 6 million CFLs, it said.

California Energy Commission member Arthur Rosenfeld said an average home in California will save $40 to $50 per year if CFLs replace all incandescent bulbs.

While not commenting specifically on Levine's likely legislation, Rosenfeld, winner of the Enrico Fermi Presidential Award in 2006, said the switch from incandescent bulbs became feasible about five years ago when CFL performance improved.

"This is clearly an idea whose time has come," he said.

Levine, a Democrat from Van Nuys in Los Angeles, last year introduced a bill that will become law in July that requires most grocery stores to have plastic bag recycling.

brick
01-31-2007, 06:17 PM
Thanks for the help, Wayne. Formatting ain't easy!

xcel
01-31-2007, 06:28 PM
Hi Tim:

___Excellent article! Thank you for both finding and posting … And it fits exactly what we are all looking for in terms of legislation! The California State Government makes some dumb moves once in awhile but sometimes, they are simply brilliant. In this case, “Brilliant” would be an understatement if this idea becomes law.

___Good Luck

___Wayne

tarabell
02-01-2007, 02:14 PM
There they go again, taking away our choices. There was nothing wrong with R12 refrigerant and leaded gas either except some silly environmental concerns. Where's my "Free the 100W Bulb" Tshirt.

Nice job Brick and hope this is just the first of many more from you

Chuck
02-01-2007, 02:35 PM
I'll join in the thumbsup for the article!

How many other states will follow in the next two years?

laurieaw
02-02-2007, 11:41 AM
I'll join in the thumbsup for the article!

How many other states will follow in the next two years?

we have done the same at our house......let's see how long it takes the sheeple to catch on.....so many times i hear "we can't do such and such to save the planet because it's bad for the economy". hmmm, and how bad will the economy drop trying to feed people displaced by rising ocean waters, or with homes ruined by storms (think louisiana)......

Mikesan
02-03-2007, 12:31 AM
I'm new here and probably politically to the right of 99% of you guys. But I think the CFL bill is a good idea and support it because it is environmentally and economically the smart thing to do.

Chuck
02-03-2007, 08:31 AM
I'm new here and probably politically to the right of 99% of you guys. But I think the CFL bill is a good idea and support it because it is environmentally and economically the smart thing to do.

Welcome to CleanMPG!

I'm on the right side of the aisle myself (1st vote in the 76 Primary for Reagan), although in recent years I've
seemed closer to the center, although I have not changed.;)

At any rate, saving energy and reducing pollution trancends politics.

hobbit
02-03-2007, 11:05 AM
The theatre people will never go for that, since you can't dim
fluorescents for squat, but there will probably be plenty of
allowances for specialized uses. Even discharge lights with
mechanical dimming just don't have that same warm, cozy quality
we want on stage.
.
_H*



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.