Archives




View Full Version : New CO2 Enhanced Recovery Technology Could Greatly Boost U.S. Oil Production.


Valleyforge
03-04-2006, 11:08 PM
CO2 Enhanced Recovery Technology Could Greatly Boost U.S. Oil Production (http://www.doe.gov/news/3291.htm)

Washington, DC - March 3, 2006

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/Resize_of_DOE_Header.jpg

The Department of Energy (DOE) released today reports indicating that state-of-the-art enhanced oil recovery techniques could significantly increase recoverable oil resources of the United States in the future. According to the findings, 89 billion barrels or more could eventually be added to the current U.S. proven reserves of 21.4 billion barrels.

“These promising new technologies could further help us reduce our reliance on foreign sources of oil,” Energy Secretary Samuel W. Bodman said. “By using the proven technique of carbon sequestration, we get the double benefit of taking carbon dioxide out of air while getting more oil out of the earth.”

The 89 billion barrel jump in resources was one of a number of possible increases identified in a series of assessments done for DOE which also found that, in the longer term, multiple advances in technology and widespread sequestration of industrial carbon dioxide could eventually add as much as 430 billion new barrels to the technically recoverable resource.

If the 89 billion barrels in resources is converted to reserves, the U.S. would be fifth in the world behind Iraq with 115 billion barrels, and an additional 430 billion barrels would make it first, ahead of Saudi Arabia with 261 billion barrels.

Next-generation enhanced recovery with carbon dioxide was judged to be a “game-changer” in oil production, one capable of doubling recovery efficiency. And geologic sequestration of industrial carbon dioxide in declining oil fields was endorsed last year as a potential method of reducing greenhouse base emissions by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The assessments looked at maximizing oil production and accelerating the productive use of carbon dioxide in all categories of petroleum resources, including as-yet undiscovered oil and the new resources in the residual oil zone. The findings are consolidated in the February 2006 report Undeveloped Domestic Oil Resources: The Foundation for Increasing Oil Production and a Viable Domestic Oil Industry (http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/eor/Undeveloped_Domestic_Oil_Resources_Provi.html ).

The 430 billion barrel potential was identified in increments of up to 110 billon barrels from applying today's state-of-the-art enhanced recovery in discovered fields – 90 billion in light oil, 20 billion in heavy oil; up to 179 billion barrels from undiscovered oil – 119 billion from conventional technology, 60 billion from enhanced recovery; up to 111 billion barrels from reserve growth – 71 billion from conventional technology, 40 billion from enhanced recovery; up to 20 billion from tapping the residual oil zone with enhanced recovery; and, another 10 billion from tar sands.

The separate assessments and reports contributing to the total resource estimate are: Basin Oriented Assessments (http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/eor/Ten_Basin-Oriented_CO2-EOR_Assessments.html ), ten assessments of producing U.S. basins and the potential of state-of-the-art enhanced oil recovery; Stranded Oil in the Residual Oil Zone (ROZ) [web link], five reports looking at new resources in the residual oil zone; and, Evaluation of the Potential for "Game-Changer" Improvements in Oil Recovery Efficiency for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/eor/Game_Changer_Oil_Recovery_Efficiency.html), a report on next-generation technology. They were prepared by Advanced Resources International and Melzer Consulting.

Media contact(s):
Craig Stevens, 202/586-4940

cleverlever
03-05-2006, 10:47 AM
Cost and environmental impact?

I don't see any references to those subjects and I don't see how the technology impacts in the USA any differently than any other country that has oil fields that are experiencing declining out put.

Being kind of ignorant on any thing that doesn't involve common sense I don't see how this is going to work unless the source of CO2 is in the oil fields. I see needs for lots of new infrastructure to accomplish this task.

On the other hand constructive dialogue on all solutions to the energy problem should be encouraged.

xcel
03-05-2006, 12:35 PM
Hi Cob:

___Some of the news items I have posted leave a bad taste in my mouth but are pertinent to view the other side of the equation. A few of us talked about this thread in chat last night. I am very skeptical of this recovery capability because if it were so easy, wouldn’t the Alaskan fields output be picking back up to its pre-peak numbers? It is not like CO2 injection just like sea water injection has not helped in keeping field pressures up but this technique is really very old news. I will be watching the EIA production figures on the Alaskan fields in particular as that is as close to an isolated control volume as I know of in the oil business with real and factual output being tracked down to the last 1,000 BBl’s.

___Good Luck

___Wayne



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.