Archives




View Full Version : AIG executives spend tens of thousands on perks again!!!


xcel
10-16-2008, 01:51 PM
This time, an $86,000 hunting trip after the second $37.8 Billion tax payer injection on top of the previous $85 Billion... (http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3InVeHoYnmXZnM2ACXSgjG0-nIQD93R69002)

http://www.cleanmpg.com/photos/data/501/AIG.jpgIeva Augstums - AP – Oct. 15, 2008

AIG too big to fail? Screw that!

When is enough, enough? The ******** in charge and partaking in this crap needs to be fired without the golden parachute :mad: :mad: :mad: -- Ed.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. - A handful of top executives from American International Group Inc. spent thousands of dollars during a recent English hunting trip, even as the New York-based insurer asked for an additional $37.8 billion loan from the Federal Reserve.

The news comes as New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo on Wednesday told the insurance giant to do away with golden parachutes for executives, golf outings and parties while taking government money to stay afloat.

Cuomo said he has the power under state business law to review and possibly rescind any inappropriate AIG spending as long as the Federal Reserve is propping up the huge insurer with almost $123 billion in loans announced since Sept. 16.

"This was an annual event for customers of the AIG property casualty insurance companies in the U.K. and Europe, and planned months before the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's loan to AIG," company spokesman Peter Tulupman said Wednesday morning.

In a prepared statement later in the day, the company said, "We will continue to take all measures necessary to ensure that these activities cease immediately. AIG's priority is to continue focusing on actions necessary to repay the Federal Reserve loan and emerge as a vital, ongoing business."

AIG officials declined to say which AIG executives attended the trip, which reports have said racked up an $86,000 tab. News of the hunting trip surfaced just days after AIG received an additional $37.8 billion loan from the Federal Reserve, on top of a previous $85 billion emergency loan granted last month… http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3InVeHoYnmXZnM2ACXSgjG0-nIQD93R69002

NY Attorney General: In the last several months, as AIG was teetering toward bankruptcy, and operating with unreasonably small capital, AIG nevertheless made numerous extraordinary expenditures in the form of executive compensation payments, junkets, and perks for its executives.

For example, in March 2008, ignoring the massive losses AIG was experiencing, the Board awarded its Chief Executive Officer a cash bonus of over $5 million and a golden parachute worth $15 million.

Similarly, in February 2008, a top-ranking executive who was largely responsible for AIG's collapse was terminated, but still permitted by the Board to keep $34 million in bonuses. This same individual apparently continued to receive $1 million a month from the company until recently.

Moreover, even after the taxpayer-funded bailout of AIG, the company paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for luxurious retreats for its executives, including an overseas hunting party and a golf outing. We believe these expenditures and payments, made in the absence of fair consideration, violated New York law, specifically, N.Y. Debtor & Creditor Law fj 274, which deems such payments to be fraudulent conveyances.

AIG has responded to criticism about the hunting trip with "regret."

"We regret that this event was not canceled," said a spokesperson.

WTF :mad: :mad: :mad:

Radio_tec
10-16-2008, 01:57 PM
The Patricians, our betters, don't have to justify or apologize for it. It just comes natural to them. Now fork over that mortgage payment or we'll forclose!

Right Lane Cruiser
10-16-2008, 02:24 PM
This is just so... angering. :angry:

ChenZhen
10-16-2008, 02:35 PM
For $100 bil., we could have fired all these bozos, dissolved the company, and built a new one in its place.

PaleMelanesian
10-16-2008, 02:38 PM
Go directly to jail. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.

http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/monopoly/images/thumb/b/b0/Go2jail.jpg/170px-Go2jail.jpg

laurieaw
10-16-2008, 03:54 PM
f%$#*&$%&(*#$%ing a$$es. how can they even look themselves in the eye?

jimfromthefoothills
10-16-2008, 04:06 PM
this is a pretty smart group. All of the above comments are spot on.

pdk
10-16-2008, 05:09 PM
While I've been in favor of a rescue package simply because you can't have so many significant financial institutions fail without far reaching consequences (though I'm not entirely in favor of the proposed bailout package as it stands), this is complete and utter bull****.

sandman
10-16-2008, 06:49 PM
With no recourse for anything they do, I ask why wouldn't they do it? Its not like they are going to get in any trouble or have to pay it back..I say anyone that participated should face jail time and terminate there job, but more than likely we will just hand over more and more money to them..:(

dsharp
10-16-2008, 09:29 PM
Terminate their job? Screw that! Confiscate all their property, and enslave them for a period of 1 year per $1 that the companies they ran lost. When they're too broken down to work further, extract any usable organs for donation to suitable receipients and let them die...

Ok maybe that's a bit *too* extreme, but man stuff like this just p*sses me off.

philmcneal
10-17-2008, 01:40 AM
just a classic of "the rich gets richer while the poor gets poorer".

voodoo22
10-17-2008, 08:16 AM
With no recourse for anything they do, I ask why wouldn't they do it? Its not like they are going to get in any trouble or have to pay it back..I say anyone that participated should face jail time and terminate there job, but more than likely we will just hand over more and more money to them..:(

Exactly. These people do not care about anything but themselves. I would guess the majority of people would do the same if they were in their situation. My wife and I have been extremely fiscally responsible our entire lives. In NA society that leads to getting less benefits. For example, I was denied a scholarship once because I owned my own car. If the people who received the scholarship weren't spending all their money in bars every friday night, they would have owned cars as well. Responsible equals you miss out of the free hand outs. I'd love to let all these companies sink and take all the greedy mothers with them. You dance with the devil you should get burned.

Can't you just feel how the rich are getting even richer during this chaotic time? I believe they're in control of the situation and sucking even more wealth into their pockets from the people who trusted them and from our governments.

We need another Elliot Ness.

bnther
10-17-2008, 12:46 PM
This is just beyond words. They should be taken out and flogged until they develop something resembling a conscious.

Shiba3420
10-17-2008, 01:11 PM
This is just beyond words. They should be taken out and flogged until they develop something resembling a conscious.


Hey! I have to pay $50 an hour for that....why should they get it for free? :D

koreberg
10-17-2008, 01:43 PM
The real problem is, that this has been going on for a long time, and that there is nothing built into the system to stop them from doing it. 86k for a hunting trip is twice what the average worker makes. This is in addition to the multi million dollar salary these bozos get.

Its time to regulate this stuff. No more golden parachutes period, and put a cap on executive salaries, base it on the median salary of the employees. Executives want to make more, pay their employees more. That is how you get trickle down to work, that way everyone wins. The way it is now, there is no incentive for the execs to let go of any cash. Just spend it all on them selves, for making decisions that any of us could make.

JusBringIt
10-17-2008, 09:11 PM
Well, we know who killed the electric car, Wealthy CEO's. I'm sure the question "Who killed the US economy?" doesnt need to be asked before the answer has already surfaced.

These mongrels that prey on society's abiding citizens should be forced to turn over all their automobiles and have them traded for the cheapest fuel efficient car and never drive more than 30 miles per hour for the rest of their being. Their autos should be painted bright pink so that they are easily recognized. May their Tires be pressed up to 100psi the car's interior stripped of its interior dashboard and creature comforts and their engines be shorted of the A/C and power steering belts. They shall foot the gasoline bill of a semi while the semi foots their bill.

I'm sure that then they will understand how US residents feel at what they have done.

Shiba3420
10-20-2008, 10:15 AM
Over the weekend I started thinking about this, and I love the idea of goverment caps on salaries in public companies. Note I said public. Private companies should be able to operate without those caps. Two advantages...one, there is still a place for those 100 million a year execs to go, so less complaining about socialist behavior. Secondly, it would actually encourage private companies. Too many companies go public just to make a quick buck. That was especially true during the dot com craze, but it still continues at a reduced pace. Public companies often act very stupidly...looking at the very short term and not willing to take a short term loss to better their long term outlook, otherwise some stock holder will end up suing. Staying priivate allows a differnt way of thinking and acting. And having both public and private companies acting in these different ways would act like an insurance policy against one way of thinking leading to economic collapse.

On a slighly different note, don't you hate it when an indiviual has massive house in a state where its forbidden to take the home during a bankrupcy. It just doesn't make sense. While we should allow anyone to remain in a moderate residence, anyone sitting is something opulant should have to sell it & buy/rent something reasonable to help pay their debts.



Copyright 2006 Clean MPG, LLC. All Rights Reserved.