Ford’s Aluminum Bodied and HSS Chassis F-150 Buries the Competition during Crash Tests

Discussion in 'In the News' started by xcel, Apr 12, 2016.

  1. xcel

    xcel PZEV, there's nothing like it :) Staff Member

    [​IMG] Ford trucks are proven to be built as tough as the PR according to the IIHS.

    Wayne Gerdes – CleanMPG – April 12, 2016

    Ford's F-150 performs very well in all the IIHS Crash Tests including the much vaunted Small Overlap. Chevrolet Silverado, Toyota Tundra and RAM 1500 in that order leave more questions than answers.

    At the end of the day, one truck clearly stands out when it comes to crash protection. That being the Ford F-150 as shown through the entire regimen of IIHS crash tests.

    Two other large pickup trucks that the IIHS evaluated – Chevrolet/GMCs Silverado/Sierra and Tundra Double Cabs – earn Acceptable ratings for occupant protection within the small overlap frontal crash test.

    IIHS evaluated two body styles of each 2016 model-year pickup — crew cab and extended cab. Crew cabs have four full doors and two full rows of seating. Extended cabs have two full front doors, two smaller rear doors and compact second-row seats.

    IIHS last year decided it would test the two most popular variants of large pickups instead of just one after discovering that the Ford F-150 extended cab, known as the SuperCab, lacked structural countermeasures that helped the crew cab, known as the SuperCrew, earn the top rating of good in the small overlap test. The test replicates what happens when a vehicle runs off the road and hits a tree or pole or clips another vehicle that has crossed the center line.

    Ford improved the 2016 model F-150 SuperCab to clinch a good rating in the small overlap crash test, up from the 2015 model's marginal rating. The F-150 is the only large pickup in the latest test group to earn the Institute's top rating in the test. It joins the F-150 SuperCrew in earning a 2016 TOP SAFETY PICK award when equipped with Ford's optional basic-rated forward collision warning system.


    Vehicles that earn a basic rating for front crash prevention plus good ratings in the small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations qualify for TOP SAFETY PICK. To qualify for 2016 TOP SAFETY PICK+, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the five crashworthiness tests and an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention.

    Ford’s 2016 F-150

    The 2016 Ford F-150 is the only large pickup to earn an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Pick – not the + - for SuperCrew and SuperCab configurations.

    The segment leading results were the result of its high-strength steel frame, high-strength heat treated aluminum alloy body and smart crash energy engineering.

    According to Ford, a cross-functional group of Ford truck scientists, engineers and technicians worked thousands of hours to deliver improved safety. The team created 31 safety-related innovations including new structures that manage crash forces, and joining methods that were tested virtually with supercomputer simulations, then retested in Ford’s advanced laboratories before ever reaching the consumer.

    Some of these innovations include a patented extruded aluminum roof cross member and an additional frame cross member that improved crash resilience.

    2016 Ford F-150 IIHS Crash Test Ratings


    To manage crash forces in the IIHS small overlap frontal crash test, Ford created a system of innovations that work together to help protect the driver. Nylon hinge pillar reinforcements save weight, and in conjunction with specially designed wheel blockers - added to the SuperCab for the 2016 MY - work to control crash forces while also providing additional safety.

    F-150 is also the only full-size, light-duty truck to earn National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) highest five-star overall crash test score and a five-star rating for driver and passenger for all crash test modes and cab configurations – SuperCrew, SuperCab and Regular Cab.

    2016 Ford F-150 NHTSA Crash Test Ratings


    Raul Arbelaez, VP of the Institute's Vehicle Research Center:
    The IIHS observed differences in performance between the extended-cab and crew-cab versions of two other pickups. The Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Double Cab and the Toyota Tundra Double Cab both earn an acceptable rating for occupant protection in a small overlap crash. Survival space for the driver in both of these extended-cab pickups was maintained reasonably well overall, contributing to their acceptable ratings for structure.


    The story was different for the larger crew cabs. The Silverado 1500 Crew Cab and the Tundra CrewMax earn a marginal rating in the small overlap front test. Both models had considerable intrusion into the occupant compartment that compromised survival space for the driver.

    Ratings for both of the Silverados extend to their GMC Sierra 1500 twins.

    The worst-performing pickups in the small overlap test are the Ram 1500 Crew Cab and the Ram 1500 Quad Cab. Both earn a marginal rating overall and a poor rating for structure. The force of the crash pushed the door-hinge pillar, instrument panel and steering column back toward the driver dummy. In the Ram Crew Cab test, the dummy's head contacted the front airbag but rolled around the left side as the steering column moved to the right, allowing the head to approach the intruding windshield pillar.

    All of the pickups except the F-150 had moderate to severe intrusion into the driver footwell area during the small overlap test. The footrest/left toepan, brake pedal, parking brake and/or lower dashboard were shoved against the dummy's lower legs. In the worst cases (Ram Crew Cab and Ram Quad Cab), maximum intrusion reached 16-17 inches. Measures taken from the crash test dummy in all but the F-150 indicated a likelihood of serious lower leg, ankle and foot injuries.

    Drivers in these crashed pickups would need help freeing their legs from the wreckage following a small overlap crash.

    Across the board, the large pickups earn good ratings in the moderate overlap front test, side test and head restraint evaluations.

    That wasn't the case for roof strength. Four pickups earn good ratings for occupant protection in a rollover crash: the F-150, both Silverados and Tundra Double Cab. The Tundra CrewMax is rated acceptable, and both of the Ram 1500s are rated marginal. The Institute launched its roof-strength ratings program in 2009.

    Keeping the roof from collapsing when a vehicle rolls over is particularly important in pickups because 44 percent of occupant deaths in pickups are in rollovers.

    Stronger roofs crush less, reducing the risk that people will be injured by contact with the roof itself. Stronger roofs also can prevent occupants, especially those who aren't using safety belts, from being ejected through windows, windshields or doors that have broken or opened. Pickup truck occupants are the least likely to buckle up among all vehicle occupants. In 2014, 77 percent of pickup occupants were observed using belts, compared with 89 percent of people in vans and SUVs and 88 percent in cars.

    Does anyone remember Chevrolet’s recent pickup truck advert going after Ford’s aluminum body structure?

    “Cages: High Strength Steel”

    While performing just adequately in the IIHS crash tests, I think we can all call GM’s hand total BS. ;)

    Besides the F-150, the Silverado/Sierra twins are the only other pickups available with an optional forward collision warning system that earns a basic rating for front crash prevention.

    IIHS plans to test the redesigned 2016 Nissan Titan and Honda Ridgeline later this year. The 2015 Titan Crew Cab is rated Good in the moderate overlap front test, acceptable for roof strength and good for head restraints. The Ridgeline was last sold as a 2014 model. It earns good ratings in the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength test and head restraint evaluations.

    I was quite shocked to see my favorite of the Big 3, the RAM 1500 - beaten so handily in the IIHS Crash Test regimens. A poor showing that will hopefully move RAMs structural engineers back to their drawing boards for a more solid redesign similar to what Ford did with their 2015 to 2016 models.
  2. Prozac

    Prozac Well-Known Member

    That is a shame about the Ram 1500, but way to go Ford.
    xcel likes this.
  3. joshdurston

    joshdurston Rogue Canadian

    Why were multiple body styles tested for all other trucks, but only one for Ford? Can we assume the missing body styles are equally good?
  4. brick

    brick Answers to "that guy."

    That's the implication. According to the video Ford went back and improved the extended cab version for '16 so its performance would match the quad.

Share This Page